In May 1961, then-US president John F. Kennedy stirred the US and the world with these words: “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth.”
Just eight years later, NASA did just that — with astounding benefits for science, technology and the world economy. Now, a group of leading scientists, innovators and economists has identified this era’s moonshot: to replace fossil fuels with clean-energy technologies within this generation.
Since a group of policy leaders from the UK initiated the Global Apollo Programme to Combat Climate Change earlier this year, many have enthusiastically signed on. The program, named after the NASA moon mission, is built on the idea of “directed technological change.”
In other words, people can steer the development of the advanced technologies needed to ensure humanity’s safety and wellbeing. At the top of the list is clean energy, which will enable people to head off the global warming caused by the combustion of massive amounts of coal, oil and gas worldwide.
The Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP) has demonstrated that a low-carbon future is within reach, with huge benefits at a very modest cost. In the US, for example, cutting emissions by 80 percent by 2050 is not only feasible; it would require added outlays of only about 1 percent of GDP per year. And the benefits — including a safer climate, smarter infrastructure, better vehicles and cleaner air — would be massive.
Pathways to a low-carbon future focus on three main actions: improving energy efficiency, producing electricity from low-carbon energy sources, and switching from petroleum to low-carbon energy for powering vehicles and heating buildings. These are clear and achievable goals and the public sector should play a major role in advancing them.
Politicians need to end subsidies for coal, oil and gas, and start taxing emissions from their use. Moreover, they must meet the need for new power lines to carry low-carbon solar, wind, geothermal and hydroelectric power from remote areas to population centers.
However, meeting these requirements presupposes advances in technologies that will enable low-carbon energy systems to compete with the alternatives. That is where the Apollo Programme comes in, with its bold goal of reducing the cost of renewable energy to below that of coal, oil and gas.
Of course, renewable energy is sometimes already cheaper than fossil fuels — when the sun is shining bright or the wind is blowing strong and consistently. The main challenge with renewable energy is storage, in two senses.
First, consumers need to store renewable energy for use in vehicles in a low-cost and efficient way. While many already have high-quality electric vehicles, they require improvements in range and cost to be able to outcompete conventional vehicles. The highest technological priority is to develop batteries for transport that are cheaper, longer-lasting, faster-charging and lighter.
Second, energy suppliers need to store intermittent energy for times when the wind is not blowing, the sun is not shining and rivers are not flowing strongly enough to turn hydroelectric turbines. Many energy-storage technologies are already in use or in development. One example is pumped hydropower, in which excess wind and solar energy is used to pump water uphill into reservoirs that can later produce hydroelectric power. Another is the conversion of renewable energy into hydrogen or a synthetic liquid fuel made with carbon dioxide from the air. Others include compressed air and large-scale battery storage.
Low-carbon technologies can be improved markedly in many other areas as well. Power grids running on renewable energy need more sophisticated systems for balancing energy supply and demand. Improvements in carbon capture and storage technologies would enable some fossil fuels to be used safely. And nuclear power plant designs can be made safer with passive safety systems and fuel cycles that leave behind less radioactive waste and fissile material that could be turned into weapons.
Given the trillions of US dollars of potential losses from human-induced climate change and the trillions of US dollars invested annually in global energy systems, the world’s governments would be wise to invest tens of billions of US dollars each year in the research and development (R&D) needed to achieve a low-carbon energy future. With this in mind, more than one politician should have already followed in Kennedy’s footsteps, stepping forward to announce this generation’s critical moonshot and to offer the public finances needed to make it happen.
So far, none has. In the US, for example, the government allocates about US$31 billion per year to biomedical research — with great returns to health — and roughly US$65 billion per year for military R&D, but only about US$7 billion per year for non-defense energy, and, of that, less than US$2 billion per year for renewable-energy R&D.
This is a shocking lapse on two counts: First, the US and the world are losing time on decarbonization; and, second, the US is squandering the chance to develop its own future high-tech industries.
Together, the Apollo Programme and the DDPP point the world’s governments toward the agreement they should reach at the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris in December.
First, governments should pledge to decarbonize their economies to keep global warming below the extreme danger zone of 2?C.
Second, they should promise to unveil, in the next couple of years, national “pathways” to deep decarbonization by 2050.
Finally, they should join together to fund the new global moonshot for clean energy. The pooled financing should start with a minimum of US$15 billion per year and rise sharply thereafter, as key, high-return technology breakthroughs come into view.
As Kennedy showed, great progress begins with a great goal, one that is bold yet feasible. The goal today, backed by the Apollo Programme, is deep decarbonization. It is time for world leaders to commit to the planet-saving clean-energy moonshot.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management, and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, as well as a special adviser to the UN secretary-general on the Millennium Development Goals.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth