In February, the White House announced that it had invited the leaders of four Asian nations to the US: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), South Korean President Park Geun-hye, and Indonesian President Joko Widodo. This is the setting in which Xi is making his first state visit to the US.
In April, when Abe was visiting the US, he addressed the US Congress and issued a joint declaration with his host.
During the current visit, Xi might do as he did when he met US President Barack Obama on the past two occasions — at the Rancho Mirage in California in 2013 and after the APEC leaders’ meeting in Beijing last year: Hold a joint press conference after the meeting, but stop short of making a joint declaration.
The biggest challenge for China-US relations is the lack of strategic trust between the two governments. According to a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center, the percentage of Americans with a negative impression of China has gone up from 40 percent to 55 percent since Xi assumed power, with members of the Republican Party more likely to have feelings of enmity toward China than Democrats. Also, Obama and members of the Congress have continued to be critical of China over alleged cyberattacks from the People’s Liberation Army, land reclamation in the South China Sea, development of a military force capable of engaging the US in asymmetric warfare and the nation’s poor record on human rights.
Xi has proposed a “new model of great power relations” between China and the US. The model is, on the surface, about mutual respect, cooperation and a lack of conflict in Asia. However, in practice it is about Xi regarding Obama’s strategic shift of balance to the Asia-Pacific region as an attempt at laying siege to China.
Xi has been implementing a series of measures to counter the pivot: setting up a new air defense identification zone in the East China Sea, founding the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, launching the “One Belt, One Road” initiative and constructing a runway on the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), which Taiwan also claims. The moves are intended to reduce the US’ influence in the region.
However, there are points where the two sides can cooperate: climate change, sustainable energy, attacks from the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, a bilateral investment treaty, the Information Technology Agreement, and cultural and local exchanges.
Xi’s visit to Seattle was mainly about commercial interests. In Washington he will try to portray an image of international cooperation between the US and China. However, when he addresses the UN in New York, however, Xi will likely sing the praises of China’s development model, which would bring the US’ declining global status into sharper focus.
Xi is the head of almost 10 different task force groups within the Chinese Communist Party’s government structure, and wants to tackle corruption on one hand while chasing the “Chinese dream” on the other, all the while dealing with the new reality of slower economic growth. With all the issues at hand, the Taiwan question is unlikely to be high on his list of priorities.
For Obama, the “new model of great power relations” will be more of an issue of balance. He would want Xi to take more international responsibility, be more transparent and respect the results of Taiwan’s upcoming presidential election.
Given that Xi has been making waves in the South China and the East China seas, Obama would not want to see more being whipped up in the Taiwan Strait.
Lin Cheng-yi is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US