Japan has passed its new security bills, marking a departure from its post-war pacifism and entering a new era of engagement with the US’ “return to Asia” and “rebalancing” strategies.
The passage is going to make a difference in four domains.
First, the ban on Japan’s “collective self-defense,” which was deemed unconstitutional by previous Japanese governments, has been officially lifted. Japan can now deploy troops if its national security is threatened.
Second, the law concerning military involvement in areas surrounding Japan has been changed to include “critically impactful situations.” This revision removes geographic limitations on the Japan Self-Defense Forces (SDF), and extends Japan’s military aid to nations other than the US.
Third, Japan can participate in international peacekeeping activities. The SDF can now provide logistics support to other nations whenever necessary.
Fourth, the ban on Japan’s use of arms to assist other countries participating in UN peacekeeping campaigns has been removed. Even during peacetime, the SDF can deploy troops in defense of US ships.
How will these revisions affect Taiwan’s security, especially the Taiwan Strait, the East China Sea and the South China Sea?
The US has been Taiwan’s most important ally in maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait. As restrictions on SDF deployment are now removed, if war erupts in the Taiwan Strait and the US is engaged, Japan can now take part by providing assistance to US forces.
Taiwan, Japan, China and the US all have overlapping interests in the East China Sea, especially the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan — which is a contentious region.
Currently, the Diaoyutais are under Japanese control. If armed conflict takes place within 12 nautical miles (22.2km) from the islands, Japan would only be exercising self-defense if it were to take up arms against the aggressor.
If maritime conflicts between China and the US were to occur in regions outside the territorial waters of the Diaoyutai Islands, Japan can engage in collective self-defense and aid US military operations.
The South China Sea is a more complex issue.
For the past year, China has accelerated its artificial island projects in this region giving Washington a sense of unease. The US has been involved in the South China Sea conflict since May this year, but because of the size of the region, the US cannot monitor and contain China alone.
The US has clearly expressed its desire for Japan to participate in patrolling the region.
The passing of the new security bills means that Japan can now get directly involved.
About 40 percent of Japan’s commercial vessels sail through the Strait of Malacca. It would not be surprising if Japan were to regard any conflicts in the region as matters of national security. Nor would it be surprising if Japan were to engage in the South China Sea conflict on the grounds of aiding its US ally.
Japan’s passage of the new security bills is a game changer in three seas in which Taiwan, China, the US and Japan all have a stake.
How to secure Taiwan’s strategic position is critical to how security development in the region is to develop.
It is a challenge that could test Taiwan’s strategic capability.
John Lim is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Modern History and an adjunct associate professor at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused