Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) is representing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in January’s presidential election. However, it is shocking that, having served as a lawmaker for a quarter-century, the fundamental principles of democracy still seem to sound Greek to her.
Hung posted an article late on Friday night lamenting the loss of trust in Taiwanese society, adding that she is especially worried about the public’s distrust of the media, president, officials, lawmakers and judges. Citing the example of the late Li Kwoh-ting (李國鼎), who had served in various Cabinet positions from 1965 to 1988 — mostly during the Martial Law period — Hung said that the distrust between ordinary people and politicians today is the exact opposite of the situation during Li’s time.
Well, if Hung knows the fundamental ideas of democracy — as she should, having served as a lawmaker in a democracy for 25 years, ascending to the position of deputy speaker — she should understand that, in a democracy, it is believed that power brings corruption, and absolute power brings absolute corruption. Therefore it is nothing to be shocked about that the public do not trust the government, and, in fact, it would be worrisome if the public put too much trust in politicians in a democracy.
Actually, it is not just between the public and the government; the idea behind having different branches in a government, instead of putting all the power in one office, is to have them check and balance each other to prevent expansion and abuse of power.
Former Miaoli County commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻), for instance, was a very trusted politician in the county. He enjoyed a high approval rating and was re-elected in 2009 with a record-breaking 63.7 percent of the votes. Whenever he was criticized for controversial policies, Miaoli County residents would not hesitate to come to his defense.
When Liu left office at the end of last year, he left Miaoli with one of the most serious debts in the nation, with several corruption allegations involving himself or his family.
Liu’s story may just be an example of what would happen if the public trust the government too much.
Let us go back to Li.
It is not that surprising that Li — as well as government officials of his time — enjoyed higher support rates among the public, since during the Marital Law era from 1949 to 1987, the media were under strict censorship, and most newspapers, radio stations and TV stations were more or less under government influence in one way or another.
If government officials today can commit wrongdoings in spite of so much media coverage, if Li had been involved in any corruption or abuse of power, the public would have known nothing of it.
Earlier, Hung sparked controversy during a meeting with business leaders by saying that if the legislature could not be reformed, then she would shut it down, after a businessman complained about inefficiency in the legislature.
It is really hard to imagine that the deputy speaker of the legislature in a democracy would say something like that — perhaps political leaders in an authoritarian regime would not dare to openly say so either.
Various remarks Hung made after she announced her candidacy are shocking and reveal her lack of true understanding of democracy. It is sad to see that such a person is running for president, representing a political party that created the “Republic of China.”
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS