While Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politicians might have to accept the reality that Taiwan is under the administration of the Republic of China (ROC) government, some Changhua County members of the party may have gone a little too far by openly expressing their love of the ROC, which the party and its supporters seek to replace with a Taiwan-centric regime.
On Friday, a group of DPP political figures, including the party’s Changhua County chapter director-general Chen Chin-ting (陳進丁), former legislator Chiang Chao-yi (江昭儀), as well as county councilors Chiang Hsiung I-fung (江熊一楓) and Hsu Shu-wei (許書維) held a rally outside the train station in Yuanlin Township (員林), chanting “long live the ROC,” while holding ROC flags and a banner that read “The ROC is our nation.”
Speaking to the media, Chen even went as far as to say “loving Taiwan is loving the ROC, loving the ROC is loving Taiwan, because Taiwan is the ROC,” while urging DPP members across the nation to hang ROC flags outside their homes on Double Ten National Day.
Certainly, the DPP should accept the reality that the ROC is the nation’s government.
However, there is a big gap between accepting the reality with the intention of making a change and embracing the ROC to the extent of wishing it to wanshui (萬歲, “live 10,000 years”) and vowing to defend it.
Looking over the DPP’s history since its founding, it is not difficult to see how important “Taiwanese independence” — or at least creating a Taiwan-centric government — is.
The DPP was founded in 1986 as a coalition made up almost exclusively of social forces against the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime.
However, in 1988, the party faced a split with pro-unification members when it adopted a resolution declaring that Taiwan is sovereign and independent, and that the DPP would advocate Taiwanese independence if the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party start unilateral negotiations, if the KMT betrays the interests of the people, if China seeks to unify with Taiwan or if the KMT would not implement genuine constitutional democracy.
In 1991, the DPP adopted a clause in its charter to start pushing for a new, Taiwan-centric constitution, as well as a referendum for independence.
Although the party took more moderate turns in 1999 and 2007, it never gave up its stance on pursuing a new constitution and a new nation.
In fact, some party members have proposed to officially abolish the so-called “Taiwan independence clause” in the party charter, though such proposals never won majority support within the party.
DPP politicians who wholeheartedly embrace the ROC and wish it to exist for 10,000 years must realize that the ideology of creating a sovereign and independent nation — or at least keeping Taiwan free from China — is what makes the DPP different from other major political parties.
It is often said that the pursuit of independence and opposition to nuclear energy are the two pillars of the DPP.
What difference would it make, then, to vote for the KMT or the DPP, after KMT Chairperson Eric Chu (朱立倫) declared that the party would support a “nuclear-free” Taiwan in the long run?
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95