There have been reports that the Presidential Office and the Cabinet have decided not to raise the salaries of state employees — military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers. This is a rare instance of the government actually protecting generational justice, as this is not just a matter of NT$22 billion (US$667.5 million) — but rather a matter of leaving NT$250 billion in debt to future generations.
It is simple to calculate that the government’s announcement of a 3 percent hike in state employee salaries would add NT$22 billion to central and local government budgets. However, officials have not divulged how much the increase would add to retirement payments. Is this a difficult calculation, or is it just a matter of laziness?
A closer look into the announcement last year that the debt to make retirement payments stood at NT$8.3 trillion shows the figure was arrived at by adding debt from monthly pensions to debt from future payments to people who are yet to retire. These two numbers are proportional to salary levels. According to regulations, pensions must be adjusted accordingly when state employee salaries are changed.
If state employees get a pay increase of 3 percent, monthly retirement payments would also be increased by 3 percent.
That adds 3 percent to debt to fund pensions, while 3 percent also has to be added to the retirement insurance of working state employees.
This means that a salary increase of 3 percent for state employees adds 3 percent to pension debt, and 3 percent of NT$8.3 trillion is about NT$250 billion in “hidden” debt. This still does not include employees in state-run companies. This is the simplest and fastest way to make the calculation.
Why is there such a huge difference in these numbers?
First, based on actuarial calculations, the premium for the retirement system for state employees should be 42 percent, but regulations restrict the premium to 12 percent.
If salaries are increased by 3 percent today, that would add to the government’s payments based on the 12 percent premium and the debt left to future generations would also increase.
Second, the hidden debt keeps accumulating and must be paid eventually. A salary increase of 3 percent would further increase future annual expenditure.
The NT$250 billion that would have been added to the hidden debt as a result of a state employee salary increase of 3 percent is the result of increased future pension payments. The NT$22 billion visible in the government’s budget is not nearly as frightening as the NT$250 billion that cannot be seen, which will be left for future generations to deal with.
When the Miaoli County Government’s huge debt prohibited it from paying its employees’ salaries earlier this year, that could well have marked the first step toward a Greek-style crisis in Taiwan.
Two weeks ago, the Directorate-General of Personnel Administration announced that only NT$34.3 billion remained in the military pension fund late last year and it forecast that the fund would be exhausted by 2019 — in other words, the fund would be bankrupt by that year.
Prior to that, Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) and Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics Minister Shih Su-mei (石素梅) said that the burden of social insurance, staff costs and other regulated expenditure are increasing annually and already make up 70 percent of annual government spending, adding that it will become increasingly difficult to allocate budgets.
Perhaps the government, which habitually considers increasing pay for state employees when an election approaches, made the calculation that doing so would scare off more voters than it would win, and perhaps that — rather than an understanding of the seriousness of leaving another NT$250 billion in debt to future generations — was the reason it put on end to the suggestion.
Whatever the reason, it is a good thing that the salary increase was halted. Moving toward fiscal discipline and protecting generational justice is a move in the right direction.
James Lin is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries in the US.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US