As people learn more about the threat from substandard and counterfeit medicines, it is becoming clear that it is a far greater problem than previously thought. It is also a scourge that is most acutely felt in developing countries, where fake and low-quality pharmaceuticals kill more than 500,000 people per year and affect millions more by contributing to the emergence of diseases that are resistant to existing treatments.
Compounding the problem is the approach taken by policymakers in the developing world, who are far more likely to look for solutions abroad than at home. This shortsightedness is a grave mistake that impedes innovation and progress. When it comes to tackling high-impact health challenges like the proliferation of fake or inferior drugs, local solutions and local innovations are not only likely to be central to any successful effort, they have the potential to provide benefits that go far beyond the scope of the original problem.
Throughout the developing world, but most evidently in Africa, two groups are interested in finding tools to combat the menace of bad drugs. One group, composed of students, entrepreneurs and researchers, seeks solutions that are local, original and tailored to the needs of their societies. Its members are quick to share ideas and eager to collaborate.
While this group has produced some innovative solutions — for example, Ghanaian entrepreneur Bright Simmons is using mobile technology to address the counterfeit-drug problem — many more passionate local inventors and entrepreneurs must get involved.
The other group is made up of government officials, including regulators. They too are deeply concerned about the scourge of low-quality and fake drugs, but they are reluctant to rely on local innovation. In their minds, the solutions already exist, in the form of high-end technology designed and developed in the world’s richest countries. The challenge, for this group, lies in finding the financial resources to import these technologies.
For the leaders of developing countries, the effort needed to create an ecosystem that supports innovation simply appears too great and the return on investment too little. At countless conferences and symposia, ministry officials and government personnel insist that funds must be found to import solutions a la carte.
Research and innovation, or engagement with local entrepreneurs and inventors, is, unfortunately, never on the agenda. There is simply little interest in tapping into the enormous pool of intellect, passion and energy at home.
Officials would be wise to reconsider. There is mounting evidence that sustainable solutions must have local support and local partners; raising funds to import solutions from abroad addresses just one part of the challenge.
Many countries lack the resources to install, operate and maintain equipment that has not been designed locally. As misuse and neglect causes equipment to malfunction, more funds become required or the program simply dies. Not only does this approach fail to nurture local ecosystems of innovation, which is deeply frustrating, it also repeatedly fails to solve the problem at hand.
While some solutions in the area of drug-quality testing have come from African entrepreneurs like Simmons, such examples are extremely rare, and many are developed in the diaspora with the support of organizations from outside the region. For the most part, such initiatives never engage local students. Local curricula do not focus on local challenges or promote local innovation.
And yet, local talent is critical for solutions that are both original and sustainable. Indeed, by nurturing an inclusive culture of research, local innovation has the potential to provide benefits that extend far beyond the specific problem that is being addressed.
Nurturing the participation of underrepresented groups and creating opportunities for education and learning create goodwill and promote transparency and accountability. Building a stable foundation for future research also enables more productive public-private partnerships and stronger links between academia and domestic industry, thereby promoting economic growth.
Foreign organizations, such as aid agencies or pharmaceutical companies, do have a role to play in boosting local innovation. They can support it financially, create new partnerships, and encourage policymakers to give it more credence.
The international community has a role to play as well. This year, the UN is set to adopt the Sustainable Development Goals, marking the start of the next phase of global efforts to eradicate poverty and improve health.
As the example of developing countries’ ongoing fight against counterfeit and low-quality medicines shows, success will depend — far more often than not — on local innovation.
Muhammad Hamid Zaman is a professor of biomedical engineering at Boston University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past