President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration never ceases to amaze the public with its brazenness — and it appears to be at it again.
Last week the National Development Council (NDC) released the results of a poll that found that 82.1 percent of Taiwanese were satisfied with their quality of life, work environment and family finances.
The results, which appear far removed from reality, instantly prompted jokes among opposition parties and political commentators, with many skeptics detecting a hint of political manipulation.
A look at statements made by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) easily debunk the beautiful numbers served up by the council’s survey.
Hung, whose support rating in recent weeks saw her trailing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), has been quoted as saying: “I could have an easy sail [in my campaign] if the ruling party had been doing a good job in governing.”
In her acceptance speech at the KMT national congress last month, Hung said: “Our nation faces various challenges: competition due to globalization, a slack economy, a widening wealth gap, the lack of justice equality and deteriorating quality of life, but the biggest threats are egregious political infighting and populism, which have stalled Taiwan’s development, incited disorder, disrupted society and left people baffled.”
Hung might not have realized it, but those gloomy items she listed depict exactly what has happened as a result of Ma’s poor governance over the past seven years and three months.
Since Ma took office in May 2008, all he has given the public is increasing inflation and rising commodity and home prices, as well as a deteriorating labor market, weakening household incomes and record-high public debt.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on Friday last week revised downward this year’s economic growth forecast for the neation from its late May projection of 3.28 percent to 1.56 percent, the lowest among major Asian countries.
The DGBAS statistics showed the wages of young people have not improved, with incomes averaging just NT$30,000 per month, retreating to the level of 18 years ago. They also showed the unemployment rate rose to 3.71 percent in June, ending four consecutive months of declines.
In addition, the nation’s exports in the first half of this year declined 7.1 percent from a year earlier.
The Ma administration’s incompetence is also reflected in Ma’s weak approval rating, which has been known to dip into the single-digits, such as in September 2013 when it hit a record low of 9.2 percent.
In view of the severe economic problems facing the country — not to mention other cases of social injustice — it certainly is beyond comprehension that the council could still come up with such a brazen polling result.
Ma is known to be very fond of numbers: He likes to present policies, tout his achievements and explain almost everything in terms of numbers. Therefore, with the presidential and legislative election campaigns heating up, it is to be expected that the latest council poll would also be cited by KMT politicians in their efforts to inflate the Ma administration’s achievements.
The important question is whether the public buys it. In that light, how then is this far-from-convincing poll any different from the emperor’s new clothes?
If anything, all the council’s poll has shown is the further erosion of the government’s credibility in the eyes of the public.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers