President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration never ceases to amaze the public with its brazenness — and it appears to be at it again.
Last week the National Development Council (NDC) released the results of a poll that found that 82.1 percent of Taiwanese were satisfied with their quality of life, work environment and family finances.
The results, which appear far removed from reality, instantly prompted jokes among opposition parties and political commentators, with many skeptics detecting a hint of political manipulation.
A look at statements made by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) easily debunk the beautiful numbers served up by the council’s survey.
Hung, whose support rating in recent weeks saw her trailing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), has been quoted as saying: “I could have an easy sail [in my campaign] if the ruling party had been doing a good job in governing.”
In her acceptance speech at the KMT national congress last month, Hung said: “Our nation faces various challenges: competition due to globalization, a slack economy, a widening wealth gap, the lack of justice equality and deteriorating quality of life, but the biggest threats are egregious political infighting and populism, which have stalled Taiwan’s development, incited disorder, disrupted society and left people baffled.”
Hung might not have realized it, but those gloomy items she listed depict exactly what has happened as a result of Ma’s poor governance over the past seven years and three months.
Since Ma took office in May 2008, all he has given the public is increasing inflation and rising commodity and home prices, as well as a deteriorating labor market, weakening household incomes and record-high public debt.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on Friday last week revised downward this year’s economic growth forecast for the neation from its late May projection of 3.28 percent to 1.56 percent, the lowest among major Asian countries.
The DGBAS statistics showed the wages of young people have not improved, with incomes averaging just NT$30,000 per month, retreating to the level of 18 years ago. They also showed the unemployment rate rose to 3.71 percent in June, ending four consecutive months of declines.
In addition, the nation’s exports in the first half of this year declined 7.1 percent from a year earlier.
The Ma administration’s incompetence is also reflected in Ma’s weak approval rating, which has been known to dip into the single-digits, such as in September 2013 when it hit a record low of 9.2 percent.
In view of the severe economic problems facing the country — not to mention other cases of social injustice — it certainly is beyond comprehension that the council could still come up with such a brazen polling result.
Ma is known to be very fond of numbers: He likes to present policies, tout his achievements and explain almost everything in terms of numbers. Therefore, with the presidential and legislative election campaigns heating up, it is to be expected that the latest council poll would also be cited by KMT politicians in their efforts to inflate the Ma administration’s achievements.
The important question is whether the public buys it. In that light, how then is this far-from-convincing poll any different from the emperor’s new clothes?
If anything, all the council’s poll has shown is the further erosion of the government’s credibility in the eyes of the public.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US