Taiwan’s technology sector is finally dancing to the tune of India’s growth story.
The blue-chip Foxconn Group’s recent announcement that it is to invest US$5 billion in the state of Maharashtra over the next five years — creating tens of thousands of jobs — is just one indication. The deal is being touted as the largest single foreign investment in India’s history.
And where else if not in a place where more than three-quarters of the population are under the age of 30 with a vast pool of skilled manpower and a market worth hundreds of millions making cellphones and laptops per year. Reports say that the company, which makes Apple iPhones, even has Bollywood dreams and is discussing taking a stake in a listed company run by a director known for his blockbuster films.
This Taiwanese foray into India comes at a time when China, Taiwan’s erstwhile favorite destination, is bracing for a downturn. China is likely to continue to be an important market but for the Taiwanese technology sector the time has come for a strategic shift. The industry is ruthlessly competitive, product lifecycles are short, innovation is critical for survival and profit margins are thin.
There is little room for complacency, not least to offset the effects of China’s slowdown. This downturn is a major concern for Taiwanese investors and for the economy in general, because of its close ties with China. Taiwanese investors have enjoyed great success there in the past, not least the IT manufacturers, but Chinese labor costs are no longer competitive and there is actually a labor shortage. Little surprise there, though. After two decades of spectacular growth, the Chinese have become relatively affluent. Not all are willing to toil in factories under their Taiwanese paymasters. Foxconn has had to deal with labor unrest at its Chinese factories in the past.
Chinese tourists now come to holiday in Taiwan, to eat in expensive restaurants and talk loudly — not just on their iPhones — and be rude to locals. They even gamble in the stock market, literally taking a leaf out of the Taiwanese playbook.
So what do Taiwanese do now?
Taiwanese leaders in the past — especially the ardently anti-China ones such as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — had long scratched their heads in frustration over the overly exuberant Taiwanese businessmen putting “all their eggs in one basket.”
In response, policymakers have come up with strange industrial zones in places like Subic Bay in the Philippines — which did not go very far — because at that time everyone was busy jumping on the China bandwagon. Though commercially logical, that strategy was more politically motivated as they did not want to see the Taiwan economy becoming too dependent on a neighbor which not only had missiles pointing at it, but also claims it as its own.
And the timing was not right. Now to stay ahead of the game as the best IT sector in the world, Taiwan needs to search for a new hinterland.
And that is how India comes into the picture. India is probably one of the toughest places to do business and the bureaucracy is a nightmare, though for projects of such size receive preferential treatment. And for all the cultural differences, it seems quite a natural destination for Taiwan and there is an obvious synergy: one specializes in hardware, the other in software; one is hungry for capital and is growing fast and the other has surplus capital and is in a slowdown. Ultimately, it is often the hard rules of economics rather than anything else that determine where companies go.
The Indian domestic market is significant, which means not going there would risk ceding market share. So there is not a lot of choice for Taiwanese IT firms other than to go sailing along with the shifting winds of the global technology industry.
Given its status in the IT food chain, Foxconn’s moves are widely watched. The latest decision is likely to encourage other IT companies waiting on the sidelines to take the plunge into India.
Who would have guessed 20 years ago that India, not China or any other Asian country, would one day become Taiwan’s new technology park.
Tsering Namgyal, a former Taipei Times reporter, is a financial journalist based in Taipei and Hong Kong.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers