When Pope Francis visited Latin America last month, he made an impassioned plea for the protection of the Amazon rainforest and the people who live there.
“Our common home is being pillaged, laid waste and harmed with impunity,” he told activists gathered in Bolivia for the World Meeting of Popular Movements. “Cowardice in defending it is a grave sin.”
Heeding Francis’ call for action is not only a moral issue; it is a practical one. When world leaders meet at the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris in December to craft a response to the challenges of global warming, they should put in place policies to protect tropical forests and the people who make them their home.
Illustration: Mountain People
Francis is hardly the first missionary to have visited the Amazon. Franciscan, Jesuit and Dominican priests have been spreading the gospel in the region for centuries.
What makes Francis’ appeal different is that his words were directed not so much at the local population, but at the residents of North America and Europe, where demand for timber, biofuels and agricultural products drives the destruction of the rainforests and imperils the lives of indigenous populations.
Communities in the Amazon have suffered grievously from the economic incentives to cut down the rainforests. Around the world, indigenous people are being threatened, murdered and driven from their homelands. Of the 116 environmental activists killed last year, 40 percent were indigenous leaders.
In September last year, for example, Edwin Chota and three other leaders of the Ashaninka communities in Peru were brutally murdered, most likely by illegal loggers. Two months later, Jose Isidro Tendetza Antun, a leader of the Shuar people in Ecuador, was tortured and killed while headed to a protest against a mining project that threatened his people’s homeland.
In addition to being an affront to human rights, deforestation and the accompanying assault on indigenous cultures is a serious threat to the fight against climate change. The links between the loss of forest cover and global warming has been well documented. Carbon dioxide emissions from forest clearing and burning account for nearly 10 percent of global emissions.
Meanwhile, forest people have demonstrated that they are often the best guardians of the trees on which their livelihoods depend. The forests where indigenous people live often hold more carbon than those managed by any other owners, public or private. Indeed, indigenous reserves in the Brazilian Amazon have played a critical role in lowering deforestation rates — at a considerable cost. In the past 12 years, more activists and indigenous leaders have been killed in Brazil than in any other nation.
During the proceedings in Paris in December, nations are to be expected to present national plans — known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) — outlining the specific steps they plan to take to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. If Francis’ appeal is to be respected, these steps must include commitments to help indigenous people secure the right to their land and empower them to protect their forests against destruction.
So far, only a little more than one-quarter of the world’s nations have submitted preliminary INDCs for review. Unfortunately, few nations with tropical forests have submitted their plans, and not one of the Amazon nations has done so.
By contrast, Mexico is setting a good example. The government has used its INDC to set several ambitious goals, including commitments to zero deforestation by the year 2030 and to restoring forest ecosystems in the nation’s watersheds. Yet, while Mexico has relatively strong formal land and property rights for indigenous peoples and local communities, those rights have yet to be integrated with other regulations — hindering any kind of economic development.
Industrialized nations, such as the US and the members of the EU, bear a special responsibility for providing solutions to the problem of deforestation. Forest communities must be provided with assistance in managing their resources and maintaining their livelihoods.
The Green Climate Fund, established by the UN to help developing nations mitigate carbon dioxide emissions and adapt to climate change, should include provisions specifically for indigenous people, along the lines of the Climate Investment Fund’s Dedicated Grant Mechanism.
Francis’ upcoming trips include visits to Washington and Paris, where he is expected to continue his advocacy on behalf of the environment. It is up to world leaders to answer his call and turn prayers into policy.
Bruce Babbitt, a former US secretary of the interior and governor of Arizona, is a board member of the Amazon Conservation Association.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US