When Pope Francis visited Latin America last month, he made an impassioned plea for the protection of the Amazon rainforest and the people who live there.
“Our common home is being pillaged, laid waste and harmed with impunity,” he told activists gathered in Bolivia for the World Meeting of Popular Movements. “Cowardice in defending it is a grave sin.”
Heeding Francis’ call for action is not only a moral issue; it is a practical one. When world leaders meet at the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris in December to craft a response to the challenges of global warming, they should put in place policies to protect tropical forests and the people who make them their home.
Illustration: Mountain People
Francis is hardly the first missionary to have visited the Amazon. Franciscan, Jesuit and Dominican priests have been spreading the gospel in the region for centuries.
What makes Francis’ appeal different is that his words were directed not so much at the local population, but at the residents of North America and Europe, where demand for timber, biofuels and agricultural products drives the destruction of the rainforests and imperils the lives of indigenous populations.
Communities in the Amazon have suffered grievously from the economic incentives to cut down the rainforests. Around the world, indigenous people are being threatened, murdered and driven from their homelands. Of the 116 environmental activists killed last year, 40 percent were indigenous leaders.
In September last year, for example, Edwin Chota and three other leaders of the Ashaninka communities in Peru were brutally murdered, most likely by illegal loggers. Two months later, Jose Isidro Tendetza Antun, a leader of the Shuar people in Ecuador, was tortured and killed while headed to a protest against a mining project that threatened his people’s homeland.
In addition to being an affront to human rights, deforestation and the accompanying assault on indigenous cultures is a serious threat to the fight against climate change. The links between the loss of forest cover and global warming has been well documented. Carbon dioxide emissions from forest clearing and burning account for nearly 10 percent of global emissions.
Meanwhile, forest people have demonstrated that they are often the best guardians of the trees on which their livelihoods depend. The forests where indigenous people live often hold more carbon than those managed by any other owners, public or private. Indeed, indigenous reserves in the Brazilian Amazon have played a critical role in lowering deforestation rates — at a considerable cost. In the past 12 years, more activists and indigenous leaders have been killed in Brazil than in any other nation.
During the proceedings in Paris in December, nations are to be expected to present national plans — known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) — outlining the specific steps they plan to take to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. If Francis’ appeal is to be respected, these steps must include commitments to help indigenous people secure the right to their land and empower them to protect their forests against destruction.
So far, only a little more than one-quarter of the world’s nations have submitted preliminary INDCs for review. Unfortunately, few nations with tropical forests have submitted their plans, and not one of the Amazon nations has done so.
By contrast, Mexico is setting a good example. The government has used its INDC to set several ambitious goals, including commitments to zero deforestation by the year 2030 and to restoring forest ecosystems in the nation’s watersheds. Yet, while Mexico has relatively strong formal land and property rights for indigenous peoples and local communities, those rights have yet to be integrated with other regulations — hindering any kind of economic development.
Industrialized nations, such as the US and the members of the EU, bear a special responsibility for providing solutions to the problem of deforestation. Forest communities must be provided with assistance in managing their resources and maintaining their livelihoods.
The Green Climate Fund, established by the UN to help developing nations mitigate carbon dioxide emissions and adapt to climate change, should include provisions specifically for indigenous people, along the lines of the Climate Investment Fund’s Dedicated Grant Mechanism.
Francis’ upcoming trips include visits to Washington and Paris, where he is expected to continue his advocacy on behalf of the environment. It is up to world leaders to answer his call and turn prayers into policy.
Bruce Babbitt, a former US secretary of the interior and governor of Arizona, is a board member of the Amazon Conservation Association.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers