Typhoons Soudelor, Soong
Typhoon Soudelor slammed into Taiwan on Saturday — Father’s Day — leaving seven people dead, five missing, 402 injured and necessitating the evacuation of thousands. The nation was hit by flooding and mudslides, with trees toppled, cars smashed, statues knocked down, train services stopped, flights called off, power lost and stores closed. The deadly typhoon came and left a trail of devastation in its wake.
Before this natural disaster, a man-made typhoon rocked Taiwan on Thursday, with People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), 70, announcing his bid for the presidency.
“The way forward for Taiwan is to leave aside power struggles, not focus on pan-blue or pan-green divisions or winning and losing, but cooperation, sharing, mutual assistance and not doing to others what you do not want them to do to you. Let’s work closely together for ourselves, for our families, for our children, for everyone surrounding us to secure a bright future,” Soong said, setting out his platform.
Soong has long been known as a very talented politician. However, he has not made his presidential aspirations a reality. His first bid for the presidency was in 2000, when he ran as an independent candidate after failing to obtain the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) nomination. His second brush with the top spot was in 2004 when he ran for vice president alongside then-KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰). The third time was in 2012, when he competed against President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Why did Soong fail in all these campaigns?
There must be something fundamentally wrong with his judgment — lets figure it out.
In his campaign speeches, he said that it is indisputable that cross-strait relations are a continuation of the Chinese Civil War.
Following the retreat of the Republic of China (ROC) to Taiwan in 1949 and the formation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), cross-strait relations have been characterized by the power struggle between the ROC and the PRC, but the battle has moved on from a military confrontation to the realms of politics and economics.
Unfortunately, Soong’s perception does not match this reality, meaning his views are anachronistic. I really feel sorry for him that his understanding of modern Taiwanese history is poorer than that of the high-school students who have been protesting the adjustments to the curriculum guidelines.
However, Soong did point out that during Ma’s two terms Taiwan has had a ton of problems emerge that must be decisively fixed.
He has made six campaign pledges:
To facilitate open communication between political parties to avoid confrontation.
To revise the Constitution and establish a system of checks and balances for the government.
To fulfill his political responsibilities and to deliver an annual “State of the Union” style address to the nation.
To establish a cross-party coalition government to put an end to one-party rule.
To listen to the public and protect their livelihoods.
To establish a framework for peaceful development of cross-strait relations.
Soong has tried to convince voters he is the only presidential candidate capable of securing a peaceful future for the nation.
Well that might be the case, but it depends on which nation he is talking about, Taiwan or China?
Is he hoping to become the president of China or the ROC?
He is misguided and no one needs him — in fact, his vision is a woeful anachronism. If he is aiming to benefit Taiwan, his proposals are a good framework for whoever is elected as the next president of Taiwan.
Taiwanese face the threat of deadly typhoons every year; we are experienced in overcoming the challenges set by natural disasters.
If Typhoon Soong is hoping to collect all the pro-China votes from KMT supporters in the hopes of diluting Taiwan’s identity, I believe Taiwanese will decisively tell him on Jan. 16 next year that Taiwan is not part of China.
John Hsieh
Hayward California
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers