On Thursday last week, students protesting the government’s controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines were forced to wrap up their protest because of the approaching Typhoon Soudelor. While many of their peers lament the abrupt end to their occupation of the Ministry of Education’s forecourt, some “grown-ups” have been quick to urge this group of “rude and ill-mannered brats” to return to school and their textbooks.
Taiwanese society has long prided itself on upholding the traditional Chinese value of “honoring teachers and respecting their teachings.”
This traditional value has exerted a profound influence on the nation’s older generation — so profound that it has become their lifelong code of conduct. It has restrained them from second-guessing what school teachers or authorities tell them, let alone challenging them. Over time, absolute obedience and keeping one’s opinions to oneself have become what they believe to be the only safe way to prevent themselves from being branded “troublemakers.”
However, problems emerge when these well-behaved adults encounter a generation of young people who refuse to swallow everything they are told, who are not afraid to speak up when they see something wrong and who are tired of letting grown-ups and self-interested politicians dominate their destiny and determine their future.
Clinging to the long-established norm, grown-ups tell young people that their duty as students is to stay in school, not the streets. They question young people’s motives for standing up against what the students deem unjust, and assert — as if the students do not have a mind of their own — that they must have been manipulated and encouraged by political interest groups.
They question the protesters’ character and describe their “aggressive” behavior — which the students only resorted to because their voices were not being heard — as impudent and accuse their parents of being irresponsible.
It appears as if superficial politeness and good behavior have trumped right and wrong, and that it is acceptable to do wrong so long as one appears well-mannered.
However, the “rebellious” youths are not going to grin and bear it.
Young netizens recently lambasted Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) for posting on Facebook a photograph on Tuesday last week that appears to have been photoshopped to make student activists look bad.
The picture shows Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) reaching out to shake the hand of a student representative, Liang Yan-jou (梁豔柔), during a meeting on Monday last week, with Liang apparently ignoring the minister’s gesture with a contemptuous expression on her face.
“[A student] should at least maintain a polite demeanor when a teacher extends his hand... What kind of ‘bullying’ is this?” the caption read.
It was not long before an unidentified netizen managed to locate the original photograph, which showed that Wu was actually trying to shake hands with another student representative sitting next to Liang, whose image was cut out in the version Tsai posted.
Nearly 2,700 netizens left a “thumbs down” sign on Tsai’s Facebook post to voice their displeasure, all of which were shortly deleted. Only comments lambasting the student protesters as being ill-mannered or brats remained.
While the student protesters were forced to end their occupation of the ministry’s forecourt due to the typhoon, a reform of mindset for the country’s “ever-obedient” adults has just started.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs