On Thursday last week, students protesting the government’s controversial adjustments to high-school curriculum guidelines were forced to wrap up their protest because of the approaching Typhoon Soudelor. While many of their peers lament the abrupt end to their occupation of the Ministry of Education’s forecourt, some “grown-ups” have been quick to urge this group of “rude and ill-mannered brats” to return to school and their textbooks.
Taiwanese society has long prided itself on upholding the traditional Chinese value of “honoring teachers and respecting their teachings.”
This traditional value has exerted a profound influence on the nation’s older generation — so profound that it has become their lifelong code of conduct. It has restrained them from second-guessing what school teachers or authorities tell them, let alone challenging them. Over time, absolute obedience and keeping one’s opinions to oneself have become what they believe to be the only safe way to prevent themselves from being branded “troublemakers.”
However, problems emerge when these well-behaved adults encounter a generation of young people who refuse to swallow everything they are told, who are not afraid to speak up when they see something wrong and who are tired of letting grown-ups and self-interested politicians dominate their destiny and determine their future.
Clinging to the long-established norm, grown-ups tell young people that their duty as students is to stay in school, not the streets. They question young people’s motives for standing up against what the students deem unjust, and assert — as if the students do not have a mind of their own — that they must have been manipulated and encouraged by political interest groups.
They question the protesters’ character and describe their “aggressive” behavior — which the students only resorted to because their voices were not being heard — as impudent and accuse their parents of being irresponsible.
It appears as if superficial politeness and good behavior have trumped right and wrong, and that it is acceptable to do wrong so long as one appears well-mannered.
However, the “rebellious” youths are not going to grin and bear it.
Young netizens recently lambasted Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) for posting on Facebook a photograph on Tuesday last week that appears to have been photoshopped to make student activists look bad.
The picture shows Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) reaching out to shake the hand of a student representative, Liang Yan-jou (梁豔柔), during a meeting on Monday last week, with Liang apparently ignoring the minister’s gesture with a contemptuous expression on her face.
“[A student] should at least maintain a polite demeanor when a teacher extends his hand... What kind of ‘bullying’ is this?” the caption read.
It was not long before an unidentified netizen managed to locate the original photograph, which showed that Wu was actually trying to shake hands with another student representative sitting next to Liang, whose image was cut out in the version Tsai posted.
Nearly 2,700 netizens left a “thumbs down” sign on Tsai’s Facebook post to voice their displeasure, all of which were shortly deleted. Only comments lambasting the student protesters as being ill-mannered or brats remained.
While the student protesters were forced to end their occupation of the ministry’s forecourt due to the typhoon, a reform of mindset for the country’s “ever-obedient” adults has just started.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
RSS