Incense drifting through ancient cedars. Saffron-robed monks, limbs a blur of movement, making quick work of imagined enemies. The boing of a giant bronze bell calling the faithful to prayer.
This is the scene at the fabled Shaolin Temple, a cradle of kung fu and Zen Buddhism nestled in the forests of Henan Province, China, where legend has it monks have trained in martial arts for centuries. However, in recent days, another sound has been wafting across its hallowed grounds: the snickering of tourists trading the latest news about the Shaolin Temple abbot and his reportedly less than virtuous ways.
Over the past week, much of China has been transfixed by salacious allegations that the famed abbot, Shi Yongxin (釋永信), known as “China’s CEO monk” for transforming Shaolin into a global commercial empire, is a swindler and serial philanderer who secretly fathered children with two of his lovers, vows of celibacy notwithstanding.
Illustration: Tania Chou
The accusations — new tidbits have appeared almost daily in the Chinese media — are mostly based on documents released by a self-described former monk at the temple who says the abbot owns a small fleet of fancy cars, has embezzled millions of dollars from a temple-run corporation and funneled some of the cash to a mistress now living in Australia.
Beyond the obvious legal repercussions, the abbot’s apparent lust for women, money and bling runs counter to the virtues of chastity and austere living that he has long sought to personify as one of the most prominent figures in Chinese Buddhism. To his growing legion of critics, the scandal has heightened public cynicism about a society in which greed and crass materialism often seem to trump morality, especially among those in positions of power.
‘SEEKER OF JUSTICE’
The informer, a mysterious figure using a name that translates as “seeker of justice,” has told reporters he is fed up with the abbot’s hypocrisy and wants to see the “grounds of Shaolin purified again.”
He declined interview requests and has yet to appear in public, saying he is afraid for his safety following threats from what he called “Shi Yongxin’s henchmen.”
“We want the outside world to know that the Shaolin abbot, using Buddhism as a cloak, is a maniacal womanizer and corrupt ‘tiger’ who brazenly exploits Shaolin’s assets and tarnishes its reputation,” he wrote in a statement last week that pleaded for a government investigation.
Among the evidence he has made public to support his accusations are police depositions and photographs of a woman said to be one of the abbot’s lovers, a Shaolin nun who appears dressed in brown monastic robes while holding the baby she says was fathered by Shi. Another supposed mistress claims to have physical evidence of his lechery: semen, collected in a condom, which she sent to a doctor for safekeeping. Over the weekend, she used a social media account to post a photo of the underwear she says she wore during sex with the abbot.
During a visit to the temple last week, the modest gray-brick pavilion where Shi lives and works was padlocked, and monastery officials declined interview requests. In a statement posted online, they called the allegations against Shi “vicious, groundless libel.”
Local police officials say they have opened an investigation, perhaps moved by the media maelstrom and a public finger wag by the powerful State Administration for Religious Affairs, which warned that the scandal threatened to tarnish Chinese Buddhism.
COMMERCIAL REVIVAL
Critics have complained for years that Shi has overcommercialized Shaolin through product licensing and overseas franchises, including plans for a US$300 million luxury Shaolin kung fu resort and golf course in southeastern Australia.
Like the paying tourists who flock to Shaolin’s hourly “fighting monks” acrobatic show, other controversies have come and gone, including reports that the monastery spent more than US$400,000 on “luxury toilets” and an initial public stock offering that was scuttled amid criticism that monks sworn to asceticism should not be playing the stock market.
News accounts have also detailed Shi’s taste for Apple products and gold-filament robes — all gifts, he said — and a 2011 Xinhua report said the authorities were investigating claims that he managed to escape prosecution after being caught in a brothel raid.
Through it all, the abbot has remained stoic, refusing to respond to allegations of impropriety while brushing off requests to release details of the monastery’s finances, which include those of Shaolin Intangible Assets Management, a corporation that invests in seven Buddhist-themed enterprises and is largely owned by him.
“If these things are problems, they would have become problems by now,” he told the BBC elliptically during a visit to London last year.
A pudgy, soft-spoken man with a round, shaved head, Shi, 50, is alternately lionized in the Chinese media for reviving the 1,500-year-old monastery complex after decades of desecration and neglect, and criticized for his mercantile approach to its management.
In interviews, he has described the business deals and his globe-trotting ways as necessary to promote Buddhism, especially Shaolin’s unique brand of martial arts, mysticism and faith.
“If China can import Disney resorts, why can’t other countries import the Shaolin Monastery?” Xinhua quoted him as saying in March amid criticism over the Australia project. “Promoting culture abroad is a very dignified undertaking.”
CCP FAVOR
Even if officially atheist, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has come to appreciate Shaolin’s global profile and its ability to generate revenue. Judging from the parade of officials who have visited in recent years, many also evidently believe in the mythological protective powers of Shaolin’s fighting monks, a reputation dating from the seventh century, when, as the story goes, a band of 13 monks saved a Tang Dynasty prince from a predacious warlord.
Appreciative officials have returned the favor, giving Shi a US$125,000 luxury vehicle and anointing him as a representative to the country’s ceremonial legislature, the National People’s Congress. His other political sinecure is a top job with the state-run Buddhist Association of China.
Shi’s defenders say successful people invariably draw enemies. Li Xiangping (李向平), director of the Religion and Society Research Institute at East China Normal University, said the critics had misunderstood his role as a bridge between Buddhism and the secular world, especially a government that has the ultimate say over religious affairs in China.
“They think monks should just study scripture really hard and sit meditating morning and night,” Li said. “If you really want to promote Buddhism and influence society, you have to interact with the society.”
Amid a party campaign against corruption and gluttony that has toppled scores of powerful figures, the fact that the story has remained alive in the tightly controlled state news media for so many days does not bode well for Shi.
On Monday, news outlets gleefully reported that he failed to show up in Thailand over the weekend for a previously scheduled martial arts performance because he was “tied up” with the investigation.
‘VIRTUOUS MAN’
However, at the heart of Shaolin Inc, home to 400 resident monks and where thousands of students study martial arts in private academies that line the main road to town, support for Shi remains strong.
Recently, a group of 30 monks released a public letter rejecting the allegations against him, and even the trinket vendors wave away the innuendo.
“You won’t find a more virtuous man,” said Wang Daling, 50, a tour guide who has been leading groups through the temple complex for two decades.
However, many tourists were not buying the denials.
“Just the sight of his fleshy face to me suggests he’s guilty,” said Li Yanan (李陽南), 24, an engineering student on a visit from nearby Shandong Province. “Monks aren’t supposed to be so fat.”
Still, few thought Shaolin would suffer lasting damage given the temple’s popularity in China and abroad.
“The more gossip about Shaolin, the more tourists will come,” said Zhang Jianzhen (張建珍), 32, a snack vendor whose concession sells US$1.50 bottles of water, a 400 percent markup over those sold outside Shaolin’s gates.
“That can only be good for business,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers