In President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) New Year’s Day address marking the Republic of China’s centennial in 2011, he pledged “to create a sounder educational environment for our young people” and stressed that “education is the cornerstone of national power and children are our hope for the future.”
So much for flowery language.
Little did Taiwanese know that four years later, the young people touted by the president as the nation’s “hope for the future” would be greeted by his government with barbed wire and cast-iron doors as they sought to make their voices heard.
Student groups from high schools nationwide have, of their own initiative, collaborated to hold forums and stage protests against the Ma administration’s controversial changes to high-school social studies guidelines.
The students appealed to the Ministry of Education for talks, saying the modified curriculum stems from the ministry’s failure to maintain procedural justice and that changes made to history textbooks reflect a “China-centric” view.
However, instead of listening to the students’ opinions, the ministry appears to be bulldozing through the adjustments so they are implemented in the academic year that begins next month.
While the students ought be congratulated for manifesting the purpose of education, which is to foster their ability to think critically and act correspondingly, the Ma government ought be ashamed for not only failing to adhere to transparent policymaking, but for displaying unbridled arrogance in forcing Ma’s way no matter what.
Sadly, this total disregard for the fundamental principle of public governance is not new for the Ma administration.
The same absurd abuse of power was also displayed by the Executive Yuan’s 21-member Referendum Review Committee, which exists only to screen people by rejecting proposals backed by hundreds of thousands of signatures and disenfranchising people who seek direct participation in public decisionmaking.
While Taiwan might be a democratic country, the Ma government leaves no room for discourse on public affairs, let alone participation.
Instead, it brutally forces its own will regardless of any opposition.
“If we do not stand up today, we will not have a chance tomorrow to stand against the government’s injustice,” protesting students said outside the K-12 Education Administration building in Taipei on Monday.
While some have sought to smear the protesting students by accusing them of acting as a tool of the opposition, the students clearly know what they are doing and it appears they would not be easily swayed by any political party, be it the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party.
With the government turning a deaf ear to the protests and remembering Ma’s 2011 address, many are becoming more convinced that the purpose of the ministry is to serve a specific ideology.
They arrive at the conclusion that the Ma government, clinging obstinately to its course, is rotten to the core; incapable of being a government that listens to, has respect for, or engages in dialogue with this nation’s citizens.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS