Narrow-minded President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is a show-off who likes to compare himself with others, whether they are superior or inferior, and he thinks well of himself. He keeps boasting that during his presidency, not only cross-strait relations, but also Taiwan-US relations, have been the best they have ever been. The problem is that these claims do not stand up to the test.
Cross-strait relations today are “at best they have ever been” because Ma fawns on Beijing and dares not disobey its wishes. Taiwan-US relations are good because he dares not entertain any non practical ambitions or do anything other than the expected. Heading off on this month’s trip to the Caribbean and South American allies, he wants to give a speech at Harvard University during a stopover in Boston, but in actuality he is only going to be attending “closed-door talks” at his alma mater. What an embarrassment.
Harvard believes in academic freedom and there are no taboo opinions there. Ma, who continues to comfort himself by claiming that “China” refers to the Republic of China (ROC) rather than the People’s Republic of China, will not be able to give a public speech only, an address to some Harvard faculty and students at a rather odd closed-door conference. One can only wonder if he knows the meaning of dignity.
Boasting at a closed-door conference reminds us of the accusations that Ma was an informer for the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime during his years at Harvard, as he allegedly kept an eye on Taiwanese students’ anti-government protests by taking their photographs.
If the request for talks behind closed doors were made by the school, the decision would impair its good reputation, but if the request were made by the US government, then Taiwan-US relations are not as good as Ma claims they are.
Furthermore, Ma’s acceptance of such a disgraceful arrangement is laughable. The KMT likes to brag that it always “opens the front door and walks the main road,” but this time Ma is entering through the back door and walking the back streets, sneaking back to Harvard for a meeting. This event tops the list of humiliations suffered by the Ma administration.
Perhaps Ma has less backbone than “little red pepper” Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), who also knows how to be play hard to get when required. Hung recently wondered why she should bother visiting Washington if she is not given a higher level of courtesy than Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) during her visit at the beginning of last month.
Ma, who likes to compare himself with others at every turn, should learn from Hung and play hard to get by asking why he should bother visiting Harvard if the school does not show him greater courtesy than Cornell University showed former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) when he visited his alma mater in 1995.
When Lee visited Cornell to receive a distinguished alumnus award 20 years ago, he used a play on words in his address, saying that he should take some time to play golf during his visit and that the rounds should be called the “US Open” — open to Lee. The school’s president, faculty, students and alumni all swarmed the auditorium for Lee’s speech about the ROC in Taiwan and the nation’s democratic reform. It was presidential and it was dignified.
Cornell opened its doors to Lee, but Harvard is closing its doors on Ma.
What does Ma have to brag about?
James Wang is a senior journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers