Ordering illegal drugs from China is as easy as typing on a keyboard.
On guidechem.com, more than 150 Chinese companies sell alpha-PVP, also known as flakka, a stimulant that is illegal in the US, but not in China and was blamed for 18 recent deaths in one Florida county.
The e-commerce portal Qinjiayuan sells air-conditioners, trampolines and a banned hallucinogen known as spice, which set off a devastating spike in US emergency room visits in April.
Illustration: Mountain People
The stimulant mephedrone, sometimes sold as “bath salts,” is banned in China, but readily for sale at the Nanjing Takanobu Chemical Co for about US$1,400 per pound (0.45kg).
“I can handle this for you legally or illegally,” a company salesman said by telephone when asked about shipping the product overseas from China.
“How much do you want?” he asked.
In a country that has perfected the art of Internet censorship, the open online drug market is a blatant example of what international law enforcement officials say is China’s reluctance to take action as it has emerged as a major player in the global supply chain for synthetic drugs.
While China says it has made thousands of arrests and “joined hands” with foreign law enforcement agencies, officials from several countries say Chinese authorities have shown little interest in seriously combating what they see as the drug problems of other countries.
“They just didn’t see what was in it for them to look into their own industries exporting these chemicals,” former Mexican ambassador to China Jorge Guajardo said.
China’s chemical factories and drug traffickers have exploited this opportunity, turning the nation into a leading producer and exporter of synthetic drugs, including methamphetamine, as well as the compounds used to manufacture them, according to seizure and trafficking route data compiled by US and global law enforcement agencies.
China is now the source of a majority of the ingredients needed to manufacture methamphetamine by Mexican drug traffickers, who produce 90 percent of the methamphetamine consumed in the US, according to the US Drug Enforcement Administration.
As governments around the world have stepped up regulation of these so-called precursor chemicals, the Mexican cartels have increasingly turned to Chinese chemical factories.
Guajardo, who served as ambassador in Beijing from 2007 to 2013, said his efforts to persuade Chinese authorities to restrict the export of these chemicals, which are banned in Mexico, came to naught.
“In all my time there, the Chinese never showed any willingness to cooperate on stemming the flow of precursors into Mexico,” he said in a telephone interview.
At the same time, clandestine Chinese labs manufacture and export their own methamphetamine and other synthetic drugs around the world. In 2013, the police dismantled nearly 390 methamphetamine labs in China, according to a UN report released last month.
These manufacturers have flourished in part because the country’s huge chemical industry is weakly regulated and poorly monitored, officials say, making it easy for criminals to divert chemicals with legitimate uses in making medicine, fertilizer and pesticides into the production of new and dangerous drugs.
The labs have also figured out how to stay one step ahead of laws banning illicit synthetic drugs simply by tweaking a few molecules, creating new and not-yet-illegal drugs.
Since 2008, the number of new psychoactive substances reported to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime has soared more than eightfold to 541, far outpacing the 244 drugs controlled under global conventions. Often sold as “legal highs” and “research chemicals,” these drugs are designed to exploit an outdated international legal framework.
Some countries, including the US, have banned whole ranges of chemicals that mimic illegal drugs, but many nations do not. The EU in particular, with its open borders and disparate drug laws, provides ample opportunity for smuggling contraband.
“Drug traffickers take advantage of this,” said Soren Pedersen, a spokesman for the European police agency Europol. “As soon as a substance becomes illegal in Germany, they can just divert it to Denmark, Sweden or Austria.”
Several US officials said China was the primary source for new synthetic drugs.
“Hands down China is No. 1,” said a federal law enforcement official, who was not authorized to speak publicly.
“We’re seeing cases nationwide and ground zero always seems to be China,” said Carla Freedman, an assistant district attorney in New York who in 2013 prosecuted a ring trafficking drugs from Shanghai.
According to an Australian Crime Commission report released last month, China was the primary source of illicit amphetamine-type drugs detected at the Australian border in 2013 to last year.
In 2013, the Australian police made their largest methamphetamine seizure ever, 590kg discovered in a shipping container from China with a street value of US$450 million. Since then, Australian authorities have found methamphetamine in Chinese shipments of garden hoses, handbags, lamps, aquarium pebbles, metal shafts, kayaks and 70 porcelain toilets.
“We’ve seen it all,” said Detective Superintendent Scott Cook, who commands the Organized Crime Squad in New South Wales. “There’s absolutely no limit in terms of how far they go to import drugs. They’re ingenious.”
Chinese officials say the government is committed to international cooperation against drug traffickers.
“We aim to help and support other countries in any way we can,” Liu Yuejin (劉躍進), head of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security’s anti-narcotics bureau, has said publicly.
In response to faxed questions, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied any problems in law enforcement cooperation with Mexico.
However, Hao Wei (郝偉), a member of the ministry’s Committee for Prevention of Synthetic Drug Abuse, said traffickers would always find loopholes.
“I really don’t think only governments should be blamed for this,” he said in a telephone interview. “Instead of pointing fingers at each other, we should confront the problem and deal with it in a comprehensive and balanced way.”
China has responded to international pressure with several high-profile busts. In April, officials announced the arrest of more than 133,000 people and seizure of 43 tonnes of illegal narcotics during a five-month anti-drug sweep.
However, experts say these actions have failed to significantly impede traffickers.
“China likes everyone to think they’re in control of everything,” said a UN official, who asked not to be identified to avoid political repercussions. “But at the end of the day they have an enormous chemical industry and the state doesn’t have the capacity to monitor and control it.”
In a US report from last year, it said that China was taking steps to join global efforts against illegal drugs, but added that those efforts are “hindered by cumbersome internal approval processes” that limit the ability of US investigators to work with their Chinese counterparts.
In March, the US Drug Enforcement Administration resorted to an elaborate ruse to lure one of the world’s top synthetic drug manufacturers, a Chinese citizen named Tian Haijun, to Los Angeles to arrest him.
Even when China does make an arrest, it may not accomplish much.
For more than a decade, Zhang Lei (張磊), a 39-year-old Shanghai chemist also known as Eric Chang, manufactured thousands of pounds of synthetic drugs for buyers in 57 countries, earning about US$30 million from shipments to the US alone, US officials say.
Although wanted by Interpol since 2011, Zhang made little effort to conceal his identity or the nature of his work. He handed out business cards with his real name, address and telephone number. A photograph of crystalline white powder adorns a Twitter page with his name that links to his company Web site.
To stay ahead of local and international laws banning new synthetic drugs, his company, China Enriching Chemistry, constantly developed new chemical variations for export, US officials said.
The company’s Web site, for instance, advertises a substance called “Eric-2,” a substitute for mephedrone that costs US$1,500 per 100 grams.
“It falls outside all illegal laws currently regarding research chemicals,” the Web site boasts in slightly flawed English.
The Chinese police knew about Zhang for years and finally arrested him in 2013 on charges of producing ecstasy.
In July last year, the US Department of the Treasury sanctioned Zhang, his company and three associates under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, which froze their US assets.
Yet Zhang’s company is still thriving. The company’s Shanghai headquarters remains open and its English-language Web site, a veritable Amazon of synthetic highs, promises three-day international delivery and full refunds if customs officials seize any shipments.
The Chinese Ministry of Public Security did not respond to faxed questions about the status of Zhang’s case or the continued operation of his chemical business.
On a recent visit to the company’s headquarters in a drab office park, Zhang’s mother, Wang Guoying, 65, whose assets in the US have been frozen, sat at a large wooden desk. Photographs of Zhang and his son were displayed on a nearby bookshelf next to glass beakers and bottles of champagne and Glenfiddich scotch.
Although a product brochure in the office listed mephedrone, Wang denied that the company ever sold illegal drugs.
“What American buyers did with the chemicals they bought from my son can’t be blamed on him,” she said. “We’re a legitimate company. If we weren’t would we still be up and running?”
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Asked whether he declined to impose sanctions against China, US President Donald Trump said: “Well, we were in the middle of a major trade deal... [W]hen you’re in the middle of a negotiation and then all of a sudden you start throwing additional sanctions on — we’ve done a lot.” It was not a proud moment for Trump or the US. Yet, just three days later, John Bolton’s replacement as director of the National Security Council, Robert O’Brien, delivered a powerful indictment of the Chinese communist government and criticized prior administrations’ “passivity” in the face of Beijing’s contraventions of international law
In an opinion piece, Chang Jui-chuan (張睿銓) suggested that Taiwan focus its efforts not on making citizens “bilingual,” but on building a robust translation industry, as Japan has done (“The social cost of English education,” June 29, page 6). Although Chang makes some good points — Taiwan could certainly improve its translation capabilities — the nation needs a different sort of pivot: from bilingualism to multilingualism. There are reasons why Japan might not be the most suitable role model for the nation’s language policy. Bluntly put, Japan’s status in the world is unquestioned. The same cannot be said of Taiwan. Many confuse