The first time I met Ron Naveen was in the dining room of an Antartic cruise vessel. Most passengers on the Akademik Ioffe were dressed for the South Pole: two or three base layers, lots of high-quality goose down. Naveen was wearing a very old pair of jeans, a baseball cap emblazoned with images of hairy penguins, a disintegrating T-shirt and a pair of sandals. I reckoned, with his afterthought hair and warm eyes, he must have been in his mid-70s. He looked, frankly, like a bum.
Over the next few days, I watched Naveen in penguin colonies throughout the Antarctic Peninsula. All the time, he talked to a camera about the different breeds and the survival issues that they faced. He talked about corners of Antarctica where few people had ever been, the challenges posed by increased tourism and the temperamental life cycle of penguins’ main food source, krill.
He talked about adelies and gentoos, he talked about chinstraps and emperors. He talked without ever losing enthusiasm or reaching the edge of his knowledge. All the time, he wore those jeans and that baseball cap with the hairy penguins beneath his parka. If we had not reminded him, he probably would have worn the sandals too.
Illustration: Mountain People
Naveen counts penguins for a living. He and his colleagues spend a significant chunk of each year reaching difficult bits of the Antartic and walking round with manual clickers, ticking off nests, one by one.
He has spent the past 30 years compiling a definitive record of the geological, botanical and oceanographic features on 40 islands surrounding the peninsula and, without him, this place would most probably have remained a scientific terra incognita.
Unsurprisingly, his profession is not a crowded one. In fact, since penguins can now be counted from space, Naveen and his colleagues pretty much hold the worldwide monopoly on manual nest-clicking. Over a 30-year period, he calculates that he has probably spent more time in the Antartic than almost anyone else — about five years in total. Partly because of that, he has become the man who provides the data on which governments rely.
Why? What is he doing this for? Ron’s belief, borne out by the data, is that penguins are the canaries of global warming. Since their populations are unusually sensitive to changes in the natural world, whether it be a decline in krill stocks or an increase in sea temperature, rises or falls in the numbers of penguins within one or other colony can give us clues to changes further down the line. Some breeds of penguin (gentoo) seem to be thriving under the altered conditions; some (adelie, chinstrap) are in steep decline.
The thing with seeing things the way Naveen sees them is that it is all very stark. More or fewer penguins means more or less climate change, means more or less time for us and everything else on Earth. And the penguins might be cute, but as far as Naveen is concerned, the rise and fall of their population numbers is a warning. He cannot force the hand of governments, he can only offer up 20 years of hard-earned scientific knowledge and let it tell its own tale.
Naveen’s style of campaigning is very persuasive. Partly because he does not do it with threats, he does it with evidence and a baseball cap: the 21st century’s Ancient Mariner, out in the pack ice.
You can watch him at work in award-winning documentary film The Penguin Counters directed by Peter Getzels and Harriet Gordon.
So far, Naveen has done 23 seasons in the Antartic. Which in turn means he has made the trip across the Drake Passage more times than he can count. Every year in November, he escorts several boxloads of unwieldy scientific equipment onto an airplane from Washington to the port of Ushuaia at the bottom of Argentina, loads it on to whichever cruise ship has agreed to take him and spends three weeks in the company of passengers laughing at jokes about elephant seals that he has heard countless times before.
Eventually, he reaches a small, hostile speck of land at the end of the world, loads all his stuff on to a smaller and more uncomfortable boat, spends a further two weeks standing in a blizzard with a notebook and a one-two-three clicker counting penguins. Or he stares out of a steamed-up porthole at weather so filthy he cannot go on deck, let alone on shore, before then getting back on the same ship for another week of seasickness and bad jokes.
It is a hard job both physically and mentally, since all the penguin counters have to remain hyper-aware of changes in temperature or pressure. When the weather changes, it changes fast.
“It is a dangerous place, the Antartic. You see the best and worst of humankind and you see the best and worst of the weather — storms, gales, howling winds. But, you also have these quiet moments on the beach when a gentoo penguin crawls into your lap,” Naveen said.
Over the years, Naveen has spent enough time there to see the variations between penguin breeds.
“It is anthropomorphic, but I believe there are differences. Chinstraps are very noisy, adelies will bite your leg off — I have grown to like them and I have especially grown to like gentoos. They are very gentle, curious. I have had them run up and sit down in my lap. The adelies will just attack you and the chinstraps just make a lot of noise. They are like all bluster, but no fight,” he said.
Year after year, he is pushed back and back to the Antartic by a swelling sense of urgency. Partly because he is aware that at some time in the future he will have to stop. Partly because all the data he has collected so far seems to point toward global warming on a catastrophic scale.
“People keep asking me if I am going to retire. And I say no, I’m not going to retire. I am not ready to let go,” he said.
Of what?
“Of the Antartic. It charges up my batteries and keeps me thinking I am on the right track,” he said. “The best thing about it is that you are totally on your own — no radio, no TV, no politicians, no noise, just you and the environment and the animals. You can feel your own heart beating through your parka. It gives you a chance to think a little more expansively about who you are, what your place might be in the scheme of things.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past