Because of his essay Say Goodbye to Taiwan, US realist John Mearsheimer has been regarded as a proponent of the view that the US should abandon Taiwan. However, when Mearsheimer met with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Tuesday last week, he made a clarification, saying his essay was misinterpreted because the editor of the US journal that published it gave it an incorrect title.
In his opinion, the US should not give up Taiwan. He emphasized that Taiwan is strategically significant to the US and that if the US were to give up Taiwan, the move would have a serious impact on trust in the US among its allies, especially Japan.
However, Mearsheimer also said that as China’s economic power continues to increase, so would its military strength and this would be a big challenge to the US.
Taiwan is, after all, in closer proximity to China than to the US. If China’s power continues to grow, the US will face a greater challenge in maintaining its interests in Southeast Asia.
For the past 25 years, China’s military budget has seen double-digit percentage growth almost every year, restructuring power and causing instability in East Asia, including tensions in the South and East China seas. This is a challenge not only to Taiwan and the US, but also to all East Asian nations.
On May 21, US Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Susan Thornton delivered a comprehensive report on the US’ Taiwan policy. She said that Taiwan is a vital US partner in East Asia and that the US and Taiwan have a friendly and intimate relationship. She added that the US is willing to continue to forge a comprehensive, sustainable and mutually beneficial relationship with Taiwan.
When this is considered alongside Mearsheimer’s clarification, it is obvious that relinquishing Taiwan is the opinion of only a very few US academics and not an important or mainstream opinion among US academics and think tanks, much less the official policy of the US government.
Faced with the military threat from China, Taiwan can only strive for support from the US and other nations, which is the most basic principle in diplomacy. Indeed, Taiwan fears being abandoned by the US, hence it should strive for convergence between Taiwan’s and the US’ interests, security and values, as well as mutual trust and understanding between the two nations. Doing so would consolidate their partnership and assure peace across the Taiwan Strait. At this stage, US support is an important source of confidence — as Taiwan conducts exchanges and talks with China — and is beneficial for cross-strait development.
Any view on the Taiwan-US relationship from a Chinese or US perspective that treats Taiwan as a mere a puppet of the US fails to take into account Taiwan’s subjectivity and national interests, and is therefore unworthy of commendation. Nevertheless, this view also reminds Taiwan that the US has its own subjectivity and national interests.
Hence, to assure its national security and interests, Taiwan must, on one hand, step up its collaboration with the US, and reinforce mutual trust and understanding between the two states, while on the other, reducing conflict with China and not depending excessively on US support.
Conversely, if China does not wish Taiwan to become a US ally or move closer to the US, it must reduce its military threat and diplomatic blockade of Taiwan.
In addition, China and Taiwan should at least enhance exchanges and dialogue, since that would be the only way to establish mutual trust and understanding across the Taiwan Strait, diminish the US’ role in the cross-strait relationship and increase the possibility of reconciliation and long-lasting peace between Taiwan and China.
Moreover, China must communicate with the DPP, because the party represents at least 45 percent of public opinion in Taiwan.
Without the DPP’s participation and consent, cross-strait political negotiations are unlikely to happen.
To sum up, Taiwan must move closer to the US before it can make peace with China. US support for Taiwan is a crucial force in maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait; it will give Taiwan the confidence to engage in exchanges and dialogue with China, and make China realize that it must negotiate pragmatically with Taiwan on cross-strait political issues. This is the only way to create the conditions for cross-strait reconciliation and peace.
Tung Chen-yuan is a distinguished professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past