The political effects of the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident could be seen in the 2000 presidential election, in which former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won and gained the right to interpret what “Republic of China (ROC)” meant. In the eyes of the DPP, the ROC means Taiwan. However, since former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and his Taiwanese patry members party lost power in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the KMT has reverted to its China stance.
Although the KMT cannot express this stance even under the “one China, different interpretations” concept, the party still sticks closely to the so-called “1992 consensus” to go against its own views and accommodate the annexation strategies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), once the KMT’s inferior but now its superior.
This shows that the KMT is not a part of the Taiwanese community, but an accessory to the Chinese community. A similar mentality exists in the mind of veteran political activist Shih Ming-te (施明德), a fighter of the old days who has suddenly had the idea that “a broad one China framework” can hold both the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
From 1912 to 1949, the ROC was China; from 1949 to present, the PRC has been China. Although the ROC and the PRC are separated by the Taiwan Strait and coexist, the two are not separate nations under international law. This lack of completeness means that the ROC, the governing organization and political power in Taiwan, is not complete as a nation, putting it in danger.
In 1996, direct elections were introduced to presidential elections. Surely that should mean Taiwan has been an independent nation since then? Not entirely, because of the lack of a new constitutional procedure and international recognition.
When the DPP was in power, the imagined community that existed in Taiwan was the Taiwanese nation, but when the KMT is in power, this is distorted and begins to lean toward China.
The Republic of China under “one China with different interpretations” is merely a political lie that the KMT uses to win the support of Taiwanese. The CCP does not even bother to interpret what ROC means; it is just the remainder of a China in exile in Taiwan that the CCP has failed to annihilate.
The Kaohsiung Incident was not enough to bring down the KMT. In 2000, Chen, then the DPP’s presidential candidate, won the election thanks to division and competition between former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) of the KMT and then-independent candidate James Soong (宋楚瑜).
Near the end of Chen’s second term, Shih, with the KMT’s support, mobilized a campaign to overthrow Chen in the name of fighting corruption; in a sense, the fighter of a past era was giving the DPP a lesson.
Although Shih’s thirst for fame was satisfied, he pushed himself from the progressive to the reactionary camp. Everyone knew that the KMT was Taiwan’s most corrupt organization.
In 2008, former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) ran for president. Chen and Hsieh were the best representatives of the defense attorneys in the Kaohsiung Incident and both reached high political status.
When the DPP was in its worst shape, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who was not involved in the Kaohsiung Incident, ran for president in 2012 and is to run again next year, which shows that history is moving forward.
She must be able to mobilize the youth think before she makes a move and break new ground to leave behind a glorious legacy as history moves forward in a time of change.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US