From May 18 until Tuesday, the 68th World Health Assembly (WHA) was held in Geneva, Switzerland, and at the meeting, several WHO member states proposed a draft resolution addressing the health impact of air pollution.
Air pollution is among the leading avoidable causes of disease and death globally, and every year, 3.7 million deaths can be attributed to ambient — outdoor — air pollution. Even low levels of air pollution pose health risks, and because many people are exposed to such conditions, diseases and deaths caused by such pollution are increasing in all nations.
Most air pollutants are byproducts of human activities, such as heating, electricity generation, energy-inefficient transportation systems, inferior urban development, industry, and incineration of waste and forests. Air pollutants that are a source of public health problems include particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5) and gases, mainly carbon monoxide, ozone, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide and volatile organic compounds.
Airborne particulate matter widely distributed in indoor and outdoor environments, which can penetrate the lungs’ finer bronchioles and alveoli before entering the blood stream, are a greater health threat than other air pollutants.
The airborne particulate matter in air pollution are a main risk factor for non-communicable diseases, in particular coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, strokes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer. Eighty percent of deaths attributable to outdoor air pollution are caused by heart disease and strokes, and the remaining 20 percent are caused by respiratory disease and cancer.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer designated airborne particulate matter as a “Group 1” carcinogen for lung cancer, and there is a close relationship between air pollution and the development of children’s lung functions, respiratory inflammation and asthma. Air pollution is also related to low birth weight, premature birth and small body size at birth. Short and long-term exposure to air pollution impacts health, but the negative effects of long-term exposure are much greater than the effects of short-term exposure, which means that air pollution increases the severity of existing diseases.
Perhaps it is because Taiwan is not a member of the WHO that the Cabinet, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Environmental Protection Administration have not paid attention to how this resolution has developed over the past few years, or how it offers many suggestions about how to reduce air pollution that could serve as valuable references for the nation, which often suffers from problems with poor air quality. Examples of these suggestions are the careful selection of power generation technology and fuels; always considering the health impacts of every policy to help discriminate which policies can best address the main sources of pollution; giving county and city governments the administrative power to influence and adopt land use, transportation, building and energy system policies; and investments promoting more effective energy use, as well as the adoption of policies to phase out coal-fired power generation plants, thus reducing air pollution and greenhouse gasses.
The WHO says that its member states’ health authorities should play an important role in the response to air pollution and health issues. This call should correct the oversight of domestic health authorities, who for a long time have paid scant attention to air pollution-related diseases. The WHO makes three suggestions that the Ministry of Health and Welfare as well as county and city government health departments, hospitals and clinics should follow.
First, they should connect health statistics and data to air pollution concentrations and sources. This is particularly important in Yunlin and Changhua counties, which are affected by the Mailiao naphtha cracker; Taichung, Nantou and Changhua counties, which are affected by the Taichung Power Plant; and Tainan, Kaohsiung and Pingtung County, which are affected by state-owned CPC Corp’s petrochemical plant in Kaohsiung.
Second, they should improve the monitoring of air pollution-related health concerns, which is especially important in terms of cancer and, in particular, lung cancer among women.
Third, they should differentiate between the health risks and benefits of pollution improvement policies in the heaviest polluting sectors as well as defining the improvement solution that offers the greatest health benefits. This measure is most urgent in connection with the policies for introducing a ban on the use of bituminous coal and petroleum coke for power generation, and replacing it with natural gas, as well as a ban on diesel use, replacing it with clean fuels.
Taiwan sent a delegation of observers to the WHA meeting in Geneva, but there has been no news about the discussions of air pollution-related disease that were held at the assembly. Hopefully this article will alert Taiwanese to the importance of addressing air pollution issues and the WHO resolution will make the health, environmental, economic and transportation authorities at central and local government level work together to eliminate the PM2.5 problem and fight pollution-related disease.
Chan Chang-chuan is vice dean of National Taiwan University’s College of Public Health and director of the college’s Global Health Center.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past