Since 2000, when the Agricultural Development Act (農業發展條例) was amended, any natural person has been able to buy or sell farmland and build structures on it. Since then, the situation with agricultural land has descended into chaos of an unprecedented level.
The nation has rapidly lost land formerly used for agriculture: From 2000 to 2013, a total of 51,644 hectares of land, of which 88 percent were paddy fields, have no longer been used to plant crops.
These crops were replaced with developments, with 1,633 new buildings constructed on the land from 2007 to 2013. These buildings were constructed on 4,085 hectares of land, with the highest number of new buildings erected in Yilan County, where 7,551 houses have gone up from 2000 to March this year.
The vast majority of people erecting these buildings are referred to as “fake farmers”; only 38.8 percent of the people building on the land from 2008 to 2013 were actual farmers.
There have also been serious violations of the regulations governing construction on farmland, with as many as 76 percent of those buildings failing to adhere to regulations. There is also land being held back for speculative purposes, and when it is sold it will not be used for farming.
To address this mess, the Control Yuan interceded on two occasions in 2010, resulting in the Ministry of the Interior and the Council of Agriculture making amendments to the Regulations Governing Agricultural Dwelling Houses (農業用地興建農舍辦法) that were implemented on July 1, 2013.
However, this did nothing to improve the situation — it only got worse. Indeed, if the situation is not corrected soon, the nation’s food self-sufficiency ratio and ecosystem services will be put at risk.
Finding themselves under fire, the ministry and council announced that they would make further amendments to the legislation.
The principal change is that for an individual to be considered a “true” farmer, they must have farmer status and farm insurance, as well as health insurance. This status would be subject to rigorous checks, and ownership of farm dwellings can only be transferred to individuals engaged in actual farming.
Taiwan has a large population densely packed into cities, towns, urban areas, rural districts and local communities.
The idea that farmers need to build dwellings on their farmland is a non-issue, and the deregulation of the construction of residences on farmland in 2000 was the result of political arm-twisting by a faction in the legislature representing the interests of landowners, pure and simple.
If the nation is to address the chaos regarding the construction of residential buildings on farmland, it will have to do away with past ways of thinking and historical baggage, and consider — from the perspective of maintaining food production, food production potential and ecosystem services — whether there is a need to construct residential buildings on land for agricultural use.
The legislature needs to remove Article 18 of the Agricultural Development Act, abolish the Regulations Governing Agricultural Dwelling Houses and completely prohibit the building of dwellings on agricultural land.
The nation also needs to have an integrated plan for urban and rural development and a rural and regional regeneration plan to create a new approach to farming, promote diverse development in rural areas and bring new life to rural economies to meet the needs of farmers and those who aspire to live the agricultural life.
Yang Chung-hsin is a retired Academia Sinica researcher.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused