The US Senate agreed on Friday last week to a landmark “fast-track” Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill. Subject to the approval of the House of Representatives, potentially as soon as next month, this would grant the White House the ability to finalize negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) without congressional amendment.
These two proposed treaties, which would encompass about 40 percent and 50 percent of world GDP respectively and would be the biggest trade deals since the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), would be major wins for US President Barack Obama as he seeks to define his presidential legacy. The TTIP with the 28 EU states, for instance, would represent the largest regional free-trade and investment agreement in history.
Meanwhile, TPP negotiations comprise a dozen countries in the Americas and the Asia-Pacific region (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam), which collectively account for about 40 percent of world GDP. This free-trade and investment treaty, which trade ministers will meet to negotiate again this week, has a significant US geopolitical component too, inasmuch as it would help reorient and lock in US international policy toward the Asia-Pacific region (the so-called “Asia pivot”) and other strategic high-growth markets.
In part, this is about curbing the growing regional influence of China. For instance, Obama administration officials have asserted that the TPP would enable Washington, rather than Beijing, to write the rules of the road for important 21st century issues, including trade in the digital economy.
Moreover, about 20 years after the NAFTA was agreed, the TPP would potentially give the US a chance to review that 1994 agreement, since both Canada and Mexico are members. For example, the Obama administration has pointed to the need to push Canada on greater market access.
While negotiations still need to be done on both treaties, the TPA would potentially catalyze both and, for that reason, Obama described the measure last week as a “smart, progressive, growth-promoting deal.”
Reflecting this, Australian Minister for Trade and Investment Andrew Robb went as far earlier this month as to say that TPP negotiations could be concluded within a fortnight after the passage of the TPA, although that is likely to prove overoptimistic.
The TPA is so important to US trade agreements because it enables the White House to negotiate deals without significant congressional interference after negotiations are complete. The legislature must still approve final agreements, but must pass or reject, not amend, in straight up or down votes.
Although some agreements have been passed without the TPA, these were relatively small deals, such as a free-trade agreement with Jordan. Renewal of the TPA is needed for the TPP as well as the TTIP.
The bill was passed in the US Senate despite the concerted efforts to stop it of some Democrats, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, the darling of the liberal wing of the party. Given support from Republicans on this issue, the White House only needed the acquiescence of a relatively small pro-trade group of Senate Democrats.
With a majority of Senate Democrats voting against the bill, the TPA issue has once again exposed the divisions in the party on international trade. This is personified by recent disagreements between Obama and Warren, who might yet choose to run as a presidential candidate next year. In recent weeks, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who supported TPP when she was US secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, has declined to comment on the issue.
In the House of Representatives, the divide between Republicans and Democrats on the TPA is, if anything, even starker than in the Senate.
Indeed, support for the TPA could be negligible or non-existent from Democrats, partly because of disagreements between Republicans and Democrats over legislative maneuvers to date on the TPA which have angered the latter.
This means that the TPA passage might need to rely entirely, or almost exclusively, on Republican votes in the House. This potentially leaves the legislation at the whims of conservative Tea Party representatives, whose hostility to giving the president a legislative victory might trump all else.
Overall, congressional passage of the TPA would catalyze the TPA and TPP talks. Given that both deals would form a key part of Obama’s presidential legacy, the White House is pressing as hard as possible to see they are wrapped up before next year, when presidential and congressional election-year pressures would make it harder to secure the final passage of both in Washington.
Andrew Hammond is an associate at the Centre for International Affairs, Diplomacy and Strategy at the London School of Economics and a former special adviser in the British government.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past