During the Ebola epidemic last year, Taiwan had no way of contributing to the aid effort under way in Africa in any official capacity. After the earthquakes in Nepal last month, the Nepalese government initially refused assistance from the government.
In March, the WHO updated the International Health Regulations list of authorized ports and harbors, with Taiwanese ports still listed as in China. This year also coincided with the end of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, and the world’s governments are now negotiating draft sustainable development goals for the post-2015 development agenda, a discussion from which Taiwan has been excluded.
As the UN Development Program launches a variety of mechanisms to collect opinions on the issue of “The Future We Want” as part of the research following the 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development — also known as Rio+20 — the debate should trigger self-reflection among Taiwanese, who must ask themselves what they want.
The World Health Assembly (WHA) met for the 68th time from Monday last week through yesterday.
Since 2009, Taiwan has attended the meetings as an observer, as it did for the seventh consecutive year this time. Minister of Health and Welfare Chiang Been-huang (蔣丙煌) led the Taiwanese delegation and gave a plenary speech for the first time since he was appointed. A press release said that the Taiwanese delegation had a fruitful exchange of experiences in its seventh year of attendance.
However, each year, Taiwan has to wait for a special invitation from the WHO secretary-general to confirm its participation in the meeting, Taiwanese are still required to show a Republic of China (ROC) passport and a certificate written in Chinese with a photograph.
What use is an ROC passport when Taiwanese are the only people required to provide two documents? Under the memorandum of understanding signed by China and the WHO in 2005, Taiwan is listed in the WHO’s internal documentation as “Taiwan, Province of China.”
The “Procedures Concerning an Arrangement to Facilitate Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005) with Respect to the Taiwan Province of China” announced by the WHO on Sept. 14, 2010, said that Taiwan is a “province of China” and cannot become a signatory to the International Health Regulations.
In October of the same year, confidential WHO documents requested that each member state recognize that “Taiwan is a province of China,” and the designation “Chinese Taipei” was only used during the five-day WHA meeting.
Taiwan is unable to join other global health treaties and cooperative frameworks. In 2013, the US Department of State’s report to US Congress indicated that Washington supports Taiwan’s meaningful participation in WHO working groups and technological conferences, including the Stop TB Partnership, Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, the WHO’s Western Pacific Regional office, the International Network of Food Safety Authorities and the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework.
Although the US says that Taiwan is ready to contribute to these partnerships and is concerned over the nation’s substantive participation in them, Taiwan is still not a member of the five bodies. Participation in technological conferences remains limited to less than 10 due to the memorandum of understanding. Therefore, the report says that overall, the level of Taiwan’s participation in technological conferences remains unsatisfactory.
In addition, the EU, which has always supported Taiwan’s substantive participation in the WHO, has also expressed dissatisfaction with the restrictions imposed by the world health body.
After seven years of participation and exposure to various forms of pressure, there is no doubt that observer status is more than a simple demotion in name only, it is also a real barrier to participation.
Taiwan existence in the international sphere is contingent on the 2005 memorandum, and documents signed by China and the WHO.
However, there is no doubt that what the government calls the “WHA model” is the result of the “one China” principle that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) insists on, which arose from the so-called “1992 consensus” that the CCP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) uphold, which is a betrayal of the national interest born of expediency.
The idea that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China” — as was stressed during the meeting between KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — means that Taiwan’s international participation is set to face the same problems that are apparent in the “WHA model.”
This model has the potential to lock in restrictions on the nation’s effort to gain the recognition of international organizations. It should be discarded immediately.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and a former legislator.
Translated by Zane Kheir
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS