This year marks a turning point for the world, with the international community adopting a new global development strategy in September last year and negotiating a universal deal to combat climate change in December. To succeed, policymakers must recognize that today’s global imperatives — to eradicate poverty and improve well-being, while restoring the Earth’s balance — form a single agenda, and that the most effective means of achieving it is education.
The good news is that the proposed set of Sustainable Development Goals, which are to underpin global efforts for the next 15 years, reflect this recognition. Likewise, Article 6 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) stipulates that education, training and public awareness on climate change must be pursued.
However, with negotiations on these global agreements far from complete, it is vital that policymakers’ emphasis on education continues to be reinforced. To this end, the world’s education ministers must take the opportunity offered by this month’s World Education Forum in Incheon, South Korea, to highlight the role that education can and should play in advancing sustainable development.
A strong education system broadens access to opportunities, improves health, and bolsters the resilience of communities — all while fueling economic growth in a way that can reinforce and accelerate these processes. Moreover, education provides the skills people need to thrive in the new sustainable economy, working in areas such as renewable energy, smart agriculture, forest rehabilitation, the design of resource-efficient cities and sound management of healthy ecosystems.
Perhaps most important, education can bring about a fundamental shift in how we think, act and discharge our responsibilities toward one another and the planet. After all, while financial incentives, targeted policies and technological innovation are needed to catalyze new ways of producing and consuming, they cannot reshape people’s value systems so that they willingly uphold and advance the principles of sustainable development. However, schools can nurture a new generation of environmentally savvy citizens to support the transition to a prosperous and sustainable future.
Some schools are already becoming learning labs for sustainable development, where young students are being prepared to adapt to and help mitigate the consequences of climate change. Guided by the UNFCCC — as well as related initiatives like the UN Alliance on Climate Change Education, Training, and Public Awareness — governments are increasingly integrating education strategies, tools and targets into national development policies. The UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization-led (UNESCO) UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, which began in 2005, was explicitly intended to instill “the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary to shape a sustainable future.”
Together, UNESCO and the UNFCCC are not only promoting climate-change education in schools, they are also giving teachers the tools and knowledge they need to provide that education through online courses. Already more than 14 million students and 1.2 million teachers in 58 nations have been engaged in such learning, and 550 business schools have signed on to the Principles for Responsible Management Education, developed by the UN Global Compact.
This progress, although important, is just the beginning. What is needed now is a global movement, with every student in every country learning about sustainable development from well-trained teachers, equipped with the appropriate curricula and resources. An ambitious sustainable development agenda, together with a legally binding global climate deal, could go a long way toward catalyzing such a movement.
Of course, we cannot secure a sustainable future in a matter of months. However, with a well-designed set of commitments and targets, we can move onto the right path. In addition, with effective educational programs that instill in future generations the importance of restoring the Earth’s balance and delivering a prosperous future for the many, rather than the few, we can stay on that path.
That is the message that education ministers must emphasize at their upcoming forum, and that policymakers should heed as they negotiate this year’s two critical global agreements.
Irina Bokova is director-general of UNESCO. Christiana Figueres is executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US