Before the meeting between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping (習近平), Chu advocated a “deepening” of the so-called “1992 consensus,” and prior to that, former Taiwan Provincial Assembly speaker Kao Yu-jen (高育仁) — Chu’s father-in-law — had said that Chu should “go beyond” the “1992 consensus” and integrate with China on a wider scale. After the meeting, the nature of these statements was finally revealed, indicating that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are part of “one China,” thereby diminishing Taiwan’s status as a sovereign nation. As a result, The Associated Press reported that the meeting confirmed the aim of eventual unification between China and Taiwan.
Any reference to the Republic of China (ROC) that Chu made in Xi’s presence was merely referring to the nation founded by Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙), but he did not once mention the present ROC government. This is because Sun is still used by the CCP in its “united front” work. It is not unexpected then that a lot of people are now talking about “one nation for the CCP,” although some people seem to have misheard Chu and think that he said “one nation for the people,” one of Sun’s principles of democracy.
To play his part in the selling out of Taiwan, Chu praised the close relations between the KMT and the CCP before his trip to China, and asked why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) does not have open dialogue with the CCP. This is an utterly shameless question. Does the KMT want the DPP to be China’s slave just because it has itself been enslaved by the CCP?
The KMT was ravished by the CCP, and now it wants the DPP to be raped alongside it.
In China, the CCP has eight so-called “democratic” factions within the party, and with Chu’s visit to China representing President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), there is now a ninth.
The last thing Taiwan needs is to see the DPP turning it into a threesome and becoming the 10th faction. In this regard, Chu has indeed surpassed Ma in monopolizing relations between Taiwan and China, and the DPP is not taking the bait.
To give Chu some courage and support prior to their meeting, Xi told Taiwan that China would be unyielding in terms of the “1992 consensus.” Otherwise, as Xi threatened: “The Earth will move and mountains will shake.”
Xi proposed five points on cross-strait relations during the meeting, one of which was that without the “1992 consensus,” there can be no peaceful cross-strait relations, thus implying that if Taiwan does not accept the “1992 consensus,” there is a risk of war.
Over the past several years, Xi and his group of military advisers have made blatant belligerent, provocative remarks, but after receiving strong responses from the US and Japan, they would not dare make a scene about the recently strengthened US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Security and Cooperation.
Yet, at the same time, China cannot function without an enemy that unites the party and fosters solidarity among Chinese citizens.
Thus, China has instead chosen to pick on the feeble and powerless Ma and Chu for its own entertainment and to show off its awe-inspiring might.
Chu took this step disregarding the consequences, which was necessary for him to earn the CCP’s trust after recently having become the new KMT chairman. After whistle-blowing Web site WikiLeaks mentioned Chu’s special relationship with the US, Chu had to take action to make it clear that he is on board with China and has turned his back on the US.
In addition, Taiwanese businesswoman and Tung’s Co president Susan Tung (董淑貞), who is vice president of the global Friends of Ma Ying-jeou Association (馬英九世界後援會) and a board member of China’s United Front Work Department’s Chinese Overseas Friendship Association, told Chu that there are more than 350,000 cross-strait marriages and that if each couple gave birth to two children and invited the husband’s parents to live in China, there would easily be 1 million people returning to Taiwan to vote.
Chu tacitly agreed with this arrogant and naive comment, because one provision of the constitutional reform he has proposed would allow absentee voting, enabling Taiwanese living abroad to vote without having to return to Taiwan.
This is a smarter idea than Tung’s, but are Taiwanese so easily deceived?
Having experienced extensive intimidation from China, it is unlikely that Taiwanese will be afraid of China’s newest round of threats.
Moreover, the US and Japan already have an organized stance to respond to any threats from China.
Still, Taiwan must remain alert against the CCP’s alluring use of bribery.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Zane Kheir
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS