China bears the same responsibility as Taiwan for maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, but it is under less pressure than Taiwan to do its share, partly aided by demagogues who consistently play along with Beijing — shamelessly — at the expense of Taiwan’s interests.
A recent survey conducted during a workshop on China’s impact presented by the Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology found that 50 to 60 percent of respondents in all age groups were in favor of maintaining compulsory military service. The highest proportion, 70 percent, was in the 30-to-39 age group, while the support rate in the 20-to-29 and 40-to-49 age groups was 62 percent.
The findings surprised many politicians, including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方). He appeared to be suspicious of the results, as he dared Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), who publicized the survey, to make maintaining conscription a key tenet of her party’s presidential campaign, apparently because he believes the policy would scare away voters.
Lin’s views on the nation’s development are typical of KMT members, who believe that Taiwan has no choice other than to rely on China, and that its trade and economic cooperation with China is conducive to easing the potential of a cross-strait military conflict.
Such views have blinded them to the public’s growing concerns as China continues to beef up its military power and tighten its grip on Taiwan’s external relations, while the KMT administration has downplayed controversy over the nation’s sovereignty and status and curtailed investment in building the nation’s defense capability.
Last week, the DPP released the results of a poll which found that more than 60 percent of respondents disagreed with KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) description of cross-strait relations as “two sides belonging to one China” at his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Chu later said in Taiwan that he meant the “one China” to refer to the Republic of China (ROC).
In an apparent effort to refute the DPP’s claims, the Mainland Affairs Council the next day published the results of a poll which indicated that 53 percent of respondents supported the government’s push for cross-strait policies based on the principle of the so-called “1992 consensus,” wherein both sides recognize “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
While the two polls might seem contradictory on the surface, they are not. The implicit assumption underlying the two surveys might be that, in terms of political identification, the ROC is the common denominator of the Taiwanese populace, but people were not oblivious to the KMT’s wishful narrative that “one China” is recognized as the ROC, but not by the People’s Republic of China.
The reality that a sense of Taiwanese national identity is steadily growing could have prevented the deterioration of divisive domestic politics that have continued to put the nation in a politically vulnerable position with respect to negotiations with China, but the problem is that the cross-strait policy adopted by the KMT administration has been overly attuned to Beijing’s sensitivities.
It is no wonder that the newly drafted version of China’s national security act — which stipulates that Taiwan shares the same duties as all “Chinese people” to safeguard national sovereignty, unification and territorial integrity — and the latest Pentagon report that examined potential Chinese attacks on Taiwan were each regarded by the KMT administration as a matter of no importance.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US