Hong Kong military veterans who served in the British armed forces are going into battle against their former colonial ruler over their right to live in Britain.
With some locals increasingly anxious about Beijing’s encroaching influence in Hong Kong, the veterans have become the latest group to put pressure on Britain to provide an escape route.
Three Hong Kong military veterans who say they were “abandoned” when the territory was handed back to China in 1997 have applied for full British passports in a test case backed by some British members of parliament.
A petition for right of abode, which has garnered hundreds of signatures from ex-service members, has also been handed to 10 Downing Street in London, the official residence and office of the British prime minister.
“This is a right we deserve,” said 50-year-old former Royal Military Police officer Harry Wong, one of the three passport applicants. “We want to get back what is fair.”
Wong says he applied for a British passport before the handover, but was unsuccessful.
In the 1990s, 500 armed forces personnel were given British passports based on a points system, but others were left behind, with campaigners saying the lower ranks were overlooked.
Former British Army dog handler Alain Lau, 52, said he was told by a local senior officer that he would not qualify for a passport.
“They just put us down here when they left,” said Lau, who is a spokesman for the Campaign for Abandoned British-Chinese Soldiers Left in Hong Kong in 1997.
Concerns over China’s influence have grown recently, with mass protests toward the end of last year after Beijing said that candidates for the territory’s next leader would be vetted by what is perceived as a loyalist committee.
Veterans say they want an insurance policy for the younger generations of their families.
“One day, Hong Kong may not be the best for them. The political situation is quite chaotic now,” said Wong, whose daughter is five years old.
British MP Andrew Rosindell is supporting the campaign and raised the issue in the British Parliament in March, saying “it is only just” for everyone who had served in Britain’s colonial military to be granted British nationality.
“It was not the choice of those loyal people... to move to the People’s Republic of China in June 1997 — no self-determination for them, no referendum about their future,” he said in a British House of Commons adjournment debate on March 11. Adjournment debates are used to raise issues without requiring MPs to vote.
However, British Minister for Security and Immigration at the Home Office James Brokenshire said in response that it was a “long-established practice” for British nationality to be lost when a country ceased to be part of Britain’s territory.
He said that Hong Kong’s “best-qualified key people” were given British nationality through a selection program.
Before the handover, 50,000 selected Hong Kongers — mainly white-collar professionals and civil servants, but also including military personnel — were given British passports.
When contacted by reporters, the British Consulate-General in Hong Kong referred to Brokenshire’s remarks.
“This remains the position,” a spokeswoman said.
The consulate did not confirm how many passports had been given to military personnel before the handover, but Rosindell told the British Parliament it was 500.
Neither did the consulate confirm how many recipients were serving military personnel in 1997. Those military personnel granted British passports were part of a 7,000-person quota reserved for the “disciplined services” class, which also included police officers and firefighters, the consulate said.
Before Britain gave the territory back to China in 1997, it offered Hong Kongers a special “British National Overseas” (BNO) status to calm those worried about their future under Beijing’s rule.
Holders can enter the UK without a visa and get consular assistance abroad, but have no right to live in Britain.
About 400,000 of Hong Kong’s 7.3 million residents hold the BNO passport and some are now calling on Britain to allow them residency as they seek to escape rising tensions.
Various campaign groups in Hong Kong are pushing Britain for citizenship status, but the military veterans say their claims carry more weight.
“We were trained to fight. We also took an oath to pay allegiance to the Queen. We could have died for the country if there was a war,” said former British Army infantry corporal Fung Lit-kau, who unsuccessfully applied for a British passport before the handover.
Fung said that he struggled to find a new career when he was forced to quit the military in 1997, 14 years into a 22-year contract, as the force was disbanded.
He finally became a postman in the US after migrating there — thanks to his sister-in-law being a resident — but regularly returns to Hong Kong and actively supports the campaign.
“They owe us an ethical responsibility. It is shameful for them to leave us behind,” Fung, 55, said.
The history of Hong Kong-born ethnic Chinese working for Britain’s military can be traced back to the 19th century, when they were hired to build military facilities and provide logistical support for British soldiers.
They were sent on overseas missions and defended the territory during World War II. In 1962, the Hong Kong Military Service Corps was formed, making personnel recruited in Hong Kong regular soldiers of the British Army.
Tommy Poon, 74, who became a driving instructor after spending 22 years in the Royal Corps of Transport, said Hong Kong military personnel should not be treated differently than others.
“The Gurkhas also have it [British nationality] now. Why can we not?” Poon asked, referring to a celebrity-backed movement that won the right for British soldiers from Nepal to settle in the UK.
Another veteran, who preferred not to be named, expressed bitterness at their fate.
“We guarded against China along metal barricades on the border [before the handover]. And now we are part of China... The situation is always going to be embarrassing for us,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95