In the vast areas of the planet covered by water, human activity threatens the survival of countless species.
There was a time, for example, when manta rays were tossed back, dead or alive, when they were accidentally trapped in fisher’s nets in places like Sri Lanka. Now their dried gills are prized in China for treating everything from cancer to measles — without any proof that they are effective — and one of the sea’s most majestic creatures is being fished nearly out of existence.
In Pakistan and India, the blind Indus River dolphin, one of the most endangered species, swims a shrinking stretch of water, trapped by development and dams.
Illustration: Yusha
And in Chile, fishers who cannot afford to properly dispose of torn nets simply tip them into the sea, adding to the offshore trash that chokes seabirds and fish.
Overfishing, habitat loss and pollution threaten species in so many places that research and conservation organizations cannot do all that is needed. So, with the aim of making a dent through small, targeted efforts, the New England Aquarium, which sits on Boston’s downtown waterfront, has for 15 years awarded microgrants to projects across the globe.
The aquarium’s Marine Conservation Action Fund has paid out US$700,000 since 1999, supporting 122 projects in 40 countries on six continents.
Elizabeth Stephenson, the fund’s manager, calls these projects “stories of hope for the ocean.”
The grants are modest. One researcher, Rohan Arthur, used his US$6,700 payout from the fund to buy a “secondhand, beat-up compressor” to fill his scuba tanks. However, the support allowed him to maintain his critical assessment of coral reefs in the Arabian Sea off the west coast of India.
Arthur, a senior scientist at the Nature Conservation Foundation in Karnataka, India, said that in some ways, he preferred the scale of the New England Aquarium gifts.
“There’s a lot to be said for large grants,” Arthur said, but “often they’re fairly limiting in what they allow you to do.”
Small grants, he said, offer more freedom, but can still be transformative. “They’ve been change points in the amount we’ve been able to engage in the ecology of these reefs.”
The fund has also created a network of like-minded people. Researchers working on protecting similar species in different places have learned from one another by connecting through the program, Stephenson said. She often helps researchers apply for larger grants elsewhere. When grantees come to the US, she brings them to speak to audiences at the aquarium.
Stephenson says her small grants nourish a huge amount of work from researchers committed to protecting the oceans. Some of the grantees have stared down bandits on her time. They have been attacked by biting sand flies. They have spent days seeking out old fishers who hold the only memories of certain species and what precipitated their decline.
Gill Braulik, a dolphin expert based in Tanzania, used a US$5,000 grant from the aquarium in 2005 to conduct the first assessment of cetaceans in Iran, at a time when few others would sponsor work in the politically isolated nation.
“I don’t think it would have happened with any other organization,” she said.
Braulik used a second grant in 2011 to teach Pakistani scientists to take over her research on a blind dolphin species that lives only in the Indus River. Scientists knew that the dolphins’ numbers had declined since the 1870s, when their range stretched from the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean, more than 3,000km downstream. Now they are split into six populations by dams and limited to 20 percent of their former habitat, making it tough to keep track of them.
These animals, which can see only light and dark, went blind over the generations because vision was not needed in the river’s muddy depths. They have long snouts, pinhole eyes and thin, spiky teeth. Organizers of the Asian Games rejected a request by conservationists to use a similar, now-extinct South Asian river dolphin as its mascot, because the dolphin was so unappealing. Braulik acknowledges that these dolphins look different from the camera-ready ones at SeaWorld.
However, “they are the coolest creatures,” she said.
Braulik had twice led expeditions for Pakistani researchers down the Indus in wooden rowboats to count the dolphins. For a third trip, in 2011, a US$6,000 aquarium grant allowed her to train the local researchers in complex survey methods and analysis. Now, two groups of local scientists have led the work.
“They really don’t need me anymore,” she said.
Arthur said he turned to the Marine Conservation Action Fund to fill “funding-shaped holes” in his data. He had had a grant to track coral reefs off the west coast of India beginning in 1998, but he missed four years when he could not afford to dive.
Collecting more complete data sets — and the aquarium’s vote of confidence — may have helped Arthur win funding from the Pew Charitable Trusts, which is now supporting his efforts to rebuild local knowledge about the reefs. He is documenting the knowledge local fishing communities have about the reefs.
One of the oldest local fishers showed him how he travels through the archipelago without a compass, navigating from the reflection of the lagoon on the clouds. “If you just look at navigational systems, that in itself is a treasure trove of information,” which is lost every time an old fisher dies, Arthur said.
Even old recipes give a sense of what foods and resources were readily available in the area, Arthur said, but these were being lost with the aging population.
“When local communities are shown the value of these things, they take a lot of local pride,” he said, citing one fishing community that imposed a ban on grouper during spawning season after the researchers educated them about the fish’s spawning habits. “What lacks is the information.”
Daniel Fernando, a marine biologist and associate director of the Manta Trust, a UK-based charity, has been working to change fisheries management policies in places like Sri Lanka, India, the Philippines and Malaysia to protect manta rays and their smaller cousins, the mobula.
He used an US$8,000 grant from the New England Aquarium to conduct an additional year of fish market research — following the rays from sea to customer — to better understand how and why they were being caught and sold. Fernando, also a founder of Blue Resources, a marine research and conservation organization based in Sri Lanka, hopes to discourage the manta’s use in Chinese medicine, and to encourage US consumers to demand that the tuna they eat is fished by hand, rather than by nets that also trap rays.
Hand-fishing is more expensive than deploying nets, Fernando concedes, but “you have to make a decision.”
“Do you want cheap tuna that’s driving a species out of existence?” he said.
Fisher’s nets were also a point of concern for a conservation effort in Chile. In small fishing villages there, a US$6,000 aquarium grant helped a nonprofit group install collection bins for torn nets that would probably have been thrown into the sea. The charity, run by the founders of Bureo Skateboards, a California-based company, recycles the nylon nets to produce skateboards shaped like minnows. The villages receive some money back for projects.
The grant was out of the ordinary for the aquarium, because it focused on a novel engineering solution to marine debris rather than on a particular species or habitat.
However, “having the structure we do and our willingness to take chances gives us great flexibility,” Stephenson said. The project is now self-sustaining.
Ben Kneppers, a Bureo founder, said he hoped the story of the skateboards might inspire the next generation of marine conservationists, by showing young people “that there are solutions to what seem to be overwhelming problems.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95