Ministry censors textbooks
The Ministry of Education’s adjustments to school curriculums are running counter to the mainstream view of Taiwanese history and identification with Taiwan.
The procedure for making these adjustments was arbitrary and lacked transparency, and the High Administrative Court has issued a verdict saying that the adjustments have not followed proper procedures. The result of this verdict was that the 13 cities and counties run by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayors and county commissioners decided that they will not adopt the new curriculums.
Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華), who succeeded Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) after Chiang had to step down after he was linked to an academic paper peer-review scandal, is pushing ahead and spreading the lie that only 23 percent of the parts dealing with Taiwanese history have been changed, although the real figure is more than 50 percent.
The adjustments run counter to the principle that requires that a curriculum should be clear and simple, open and not draw any conclusions. In addition, the adjustments are full of mistakes.
The most recent version published by San Min Book Co has removed historical images depicting the White Terror era and the 228 Incident from the chapter on human rights, which raises the question of what will happen to transitional justice in Taiwan.
Will the “Taiwan Area” be the first the of seven issues (七不講) — along with Western democracy, universal values, civil society, liberalism and press freedom — suggested by the Chinese Communist Party to be banned?
Are these really issues that should not be discussed in Taiwan’s educational system? If we do not discuss these issues, then what will happen to Taiwan’s core values?
Lee Tao-yung
Tainan
Battery plan too exclusive
A new company in Taiwan, Gogoro Inc, plans to start selling electric scooters in the summer with the government’s support, according to Forbes magazine.
Gogoro has raised US$40 million in funding from Ruentex Group CEO Samuel Yin (尹衍樑) and US$10 million from HTC cofounder Cher Wang (王雪紅), a Forbes article said.
It adds: The company is getting prime real estate for its battery-swapping GoStations in a deal with the government.
The idea is a good one, but for the fact that the government appears to be colluding with one company that is backed by some of the wealthiest people in the nation.
Taiwan has many companies making scooter batteries and electric scooters. It could be a big industry. Electric scooters could reduce noise and air pollution. They could also save energy and reduce dependence on imported fuels.
The government should be working with all local companies in the electric scooter business to create a battery standard that could be used by all of the nation’s scooter makers. A standard battery could be used in GoStations, so that any person with a locally made electric scooter could swap batteries easily.
The creation of a battery standard for all of Taiwan’s electric scooters would help local companies expand to foreign markets more easily, backed by a widespread standard created in Taiwan.
The government might have good intentions, but it might be getting into trouble by supporting only Gogoro. The government might need to think more carefully about this plan.
Zachary Alan Patterson
Tamsui, Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers