Ministry censors textbooks
The Ministry of Education’s adjustments to school curriculums are running counter to the mainstream view of Taiwanese history and identification with Taiwan.
The procedure for making these adjustments was arbitrary and lacked transparency, and the High Administrative Court has issued a verdict saying that the adjustments have not followed proper procedures. The result of this verdict was that the 13 cities and counties run by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayors and county commissioners decided that they will not adopt the new curriculums.
Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華), who succeeded Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) after Chiang had to step down after he was linked to an academic paper peer-review scandal, is pushing ahead and spreading the lie that only 23 percent of the parts dealing with Taiwanese history have been changed, although the real figure is more than 50 percent.
The adjustments run counter to the principle that requires that a curriculum should be clear and simple, open and not draw any conclusions. In addition, the adjustments are full of mistakes.
The most recent version published by San Min Book Co has removed historical images depicting the White Terror era and the 228 Incident from the chapter on human rights, which raises the question of what will happen to transitional justice in Taiwan.
Will the “Taiwan Area” be the first the of seven issues (七不講) — along with Western democracy, universal values, civil society, liberalism and press freedom — suggested by the Chinese Communist Party to be banned?
Are these really issues that should not be discussed in Taiwan’s educational system? If we do not discuss these issues, then what will happen to Taiwan’s core values?
Lee Tao-yung
Tainan
Battery plan too exclusive
A new company in Taiwan, Gogoro Inc, plans to start selling electric scooters in the summer with the government’s support, according to Forbes magazine.
Gogoro has raised US$40 million in funding from Ruentex Group CEO Samuel Yin (尹衍樑) and US$10 million from HTC cofounder Cher Wang (王雪紅), a Forbes article said.
It adds: The company is getting prime real estate for its battery-swapping GoStations in a deal with the government.
The idea is a good one, but for the fact that the government appears to be colluding with one company that is backed by some of the wealthiest people in the nation.
Taiwan has many companies making scooter batteries and electric scooters. It could be a big industry. Electric scooters could reduce noise and air pollution. They could also save energy and reduce dependence on imported fuels.
The government should be working with all local companies in the electric scooter business to create a battery standard that could be used by all of the nation’s scooter makers. A standard battery could be used in GoStations, so that any person with a locally made electric scooter could swap batteries easily.
The creation of a battery standard for all of Taiwan’s electric scooters would help local companies expand to foreign markets more easily, backed by a widespread standard created in Taiwan.
The government might have good intentions, but it might be getting into trouble by supporting only Gogoro. The government might need to think more carefully about this plan.
Zachary Alan Patterson
Tamsui, Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past