Shortages: the new normal
California and several cities in Taiwan have issued water rationing measures over the past few weeks. A quick Google search will tell you that these places are not alone in the fight against water shortages: Some parts of Africa and South America are facing dire water shortage problems, threatening people’s basic livelihoods. In Sao Paulo, the economic heart of Brazil, the term “water refugee” has emerged to describe population relocation as a result of shortages.
Although some of the shortages can be attributed to meteorological cycles, the persistence, severity and inconsistencies of droughts across the globe, is without a doubt a product of anthropogenic climate change. Nevertheless, there are country-specific problems that have led to not only the inevitability of drought, but the exacerbation of it.
In the case of the west coast of the US, California relies on snowpacks as its primary source of surface water such as streams and lakes. However, this year marks the fourth consecutive year that the state’s snowpack is below normal. When surface water falls short, groundwater is drilled to make up the difference.
On April 1, for the first time in history, California Governor Jerry Brown issued an ordinance to reduce water use by 25 percent. The biggest problem with his executive order is that the agricultural sector consumes the majority of water, but remains the only industry that is exempt from the latest rationing.
Taiwan, on the other hand, has 2.6 times more rainfall than the world’s average, but is classified by the UN as an area with “scarce water resources.”
The challenge with Taiwan’s water situation can be generalized into three main areas: the disproportionate amount of rainfall across seasons (plenty of rain during typhoon seasons, but little to no rain between November and May); the nation’s topography (steep slopes and short rivers) that makes conserving rainwater difficult; and heavy sedimentation (due to illicit economic activities and landslides) in reservoirs, which limits water storage capacities.
A leaky delivery system as a result of outdated pipelines does not help either. The Ministry of Economic Affairs announced that Taiwan saw the lowest rainfall since 1947 last autumn and winter, warning the public of the urgency of the matter. Similarly to California, Taiwan started its water rationing in several northern cities, leaving only Taipei unaffected. One of the major reservoirs reported a capacity of 25 percent, the lowest since it went into operation in the 1960s.
When faced with extreme resource scarcity problems, especially when they hit one of the most essential elements to sustain life, we ask ourselves why and how we brought the problem upon ourselves in the first place? And more importantly, is there a way out of the downward spiral?
Indeed, national policies could be refined so that reservoirs can operate more efficiently; water pipelines could be repaired to reduce leakages. Prices should go up to more accurately reflect the real cost of utilizing water as a natural resource. And people’s behaviors need to change and water conservation should be rooted in their daily activities. These are some of the most critical and logical steps to tackle the global water crisis, one step at a time.
However, we must start addressing the elephant in the room; the fundamental driver that led to extreme weather events, in which drier places are subject to severe droughts and wetter places are exposed to intense floods — namely, anthropogenic climate change.
Many have come to the conclusion that climate change is not a technological problem, nor is it an economic problem — however, it can be viewed as a behavioral problem. Why is that? The solutions below can all be traced back to behaviors — whether it is government behavior, the behavior of the free market, the educational system or the behavior of any and every individual — the very paradigm we created is the problem creating water shortages. And here is how we can change that.
From a policy perspective, national governments and international multilateral oil and gas associations should advocate against subsidies on the fossil fuel industry. Many countries have already submitted “intended nationally determined contributions” in which they commit to ambitious energy mixes with reduced fossil fuels. Countries like China and India should take the lead in ending dirty-fuel subsidies, especially when their primary energy supply comes from coal.
From a market and incentive viewpoint, carbon taxes should obviously still be on the table, but perhaps a “water tax” could be introduced, by which water usage that exceeds a certain threshold will be subject to levies. Those tax dollars could go toward the renovation of old water pipelines or cleaning reservoirs.
On a more personal level, we can start water conservation by pledging to take five-minute showers, limit car washes and remove grass lawns and replace them with desert plants. To take this to another level: One could retrofit laundry machines so that water from them can be used on drought-resistant plants, for example.
Finally, let us be reminded that it does not seem all too impossible that wars this century will not be fought over oil, but over water. If we act now, we can still reverse that reality.
Angela Yeh
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US