Moving the Palace Museum
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智) said that the Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) Memorial Hall should be turned into a branch of the National Palace Museum and that the jade cabbage and other popular exhibits should be moved there. That is a great suggestion.
As a result of the weathering of the National Palace Museum following the onslaught of Chinese tourists, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has allocated NT$200 million to NT$300 million for expansion of the museum. However, Waishuangxi (外雙溪), the museum’s location, is in a narrow valley, which restricts the possibility of expansion.
The main problem is that there is no space to cater for the increasing numbers of vehicles. Today, the only thoroughfare in front of the museum has been turned into a parking lot, and an expansion of the museum is certain to bring even more cars, which would bring traffic to a standstill.
Building a basement and underground parking are important parts of the expansion plan, but the Waishuangxi faces the risk of flooding with extreme weather conditions becoming increasingly common. No one can guarantee that the underground areas would not get flooded.
This is why this “clever” plan, which pays no attention to any consequences, will only create more problems. Yao’s suggestion is a feasible alternative.
Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall covers a vast area, it is conveniently located and it could redirect the masses of people going to the National Palace Museum. With the addition of the museum’s Chiayi branch, there would not be any need to spend hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars on expanding the museum at Waishuangxi.
Furthermore, the existence and use of Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall has always been a bone of contention among the public and between the government and the opposition parties. Many renowned international museums are located in old royal palaces.
Turning it into a branch of the National Palace Museum would be in line with international practice, and it would also further legitimize the building’s existence and minimize the risk of people throwing paint on it on emotional memorial days.
Jhang Shih-hsien
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers