A year ago yesterday, scores of university students and others, unarmed yet loaded with indignation over their futures being increasingly dictated by China and with a yearning for change, stormed into the Legislative Yuan’s main chamber in Taipei and started a 24-day occupation that has since been termed the Sunflower movement.
Just as sunflowers turn to follow the sun — symbolizing positivity, openness and brightness — the pursuit of social justice and an acute sense of awareness about the challenges they and the nation face have been the light leading the many young faces to take bold steps in voicing their anger about arbitrary policymaking spearheaded by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government.
They cannot accept KMT legislators attempting to ram through bills that matter to the nation’s future in a mere 30 seconds, nor can they accept President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration attempting to pass the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement without legislative reviews or public scrutiny.
The protesters and their supporters were also indignant at the growing income disparity in the nation, which leads many to see little hope for a bright future.
A year has passed since the Sunflower movement erupted, and despite attempts by the Ma administration and some media outlets to portray the student-led protesters as rioters, the radiance of the sunflowers’ bright petals continues to foster strong civic engagement among the public. The movement and its effects have altered the nation’s political map.
For example, the KMT was bruised and battered in the nine-in-one elections in November last year. Also, a third political force has emerged, since many young people have — on their own initiative — formed new social activist groups, such as Taiwan March (島國前進), Democracy Kuroshio (民主黑潮) and Democracy Tautin (民主鬥陣).
Indeed, negative perceptions of young Taiwanese have been substantially changed in the wake of the Sunflower movement.
In the past, younger people — often said to display an apathetic attitude toward their surroundings — had been criticized as being spoiled and selfish people who enjoy the fruits of democracy without thinking of how they might contribute to or consolidate the nation’s democratic achievements.
Through the Sunflower movement, the youth have showed a remarkable level of resilience and maturity, as well as a depth of understanding about the nation’s democratization.
The movement has forced the KMT, as well as China, to readjust attitudes toward cross-strait affairs, just as the younger generations must pay attention to social issues as they learn to scrutinize government actions and keep it in check.
Most importantly, young people have shown an adamant and uncompromising attitude toward upholding democratic values and social justice.
A floral symbol of adoration and embracing new opportunities as well as a reminder of all that is good in life, sunflowers certainly have been a great symbol to represent the student-led protesters’ massive demonstrations in March last year against the government’s opaque handling of the service trade agreement.
With their tall stalks and bright petals stretched toward the sun, sunflowers evoke feelings of vibrance and radiant warmth. As such, society looks forward to the sunflowers’ luminescence continuing to uplift the social and political awareness of young people, leading them toward the continued pursuit of critically important national issues and increased civic engagement.
When Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) wakes up one morning and decides that his People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can win a war to conquer Taiwan, that is when his war will begin. To ensure that Xi never gains that confidence it is now necessary for the United States to shed any notions of “forbearance” in arms sales to Taiwan. Largely because they could guarantee military superiority on the Taiwan Strait, US administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama practiced “forbearance” — pre-emptive limitation of arms sales to Taiwan — in hopes of gaining diplomatic leverage with Beijing. President Ronald
As the US marks one month under the leadership of President Joe Biden, the conversations around Taiwan have shifted. As I discussed in a Taipei Times article (“No more talk of ‘bargaining chips,’” Jan. 30, page 8), with the end of former US president Donald Trump’s administration — and all of the unpredictability associated with it — Taiwan would not have to worry about being used as a “bargaining chip” in some sort of deal with the People’s Republic of China. The talk of Taiwan being used as a bargaining chip never subsided over those four years, but under Biden, those
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) talked about “opposing the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]” in a recent Facebook post, writing that opposing the CCP is not the special reserve of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Not long after, many people within the KMT received a mysterious letter signed “Chinese Nationalist Party Central Committee” containing what looked like a declaration of opposition to, and a call to arms against, the CCP. Unexpectedly, the KMT’s Culture and Communications Committee came forward with a clarification, saying that the letter was not sent by the KMT and telling the public not to believe
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report