Observers might be forgiven for thinking that so-called clean technology’s moment in the sun has passed.
Over the past two years, many clean-tech equity indexes have performed poorly.
In Europe, solar power took a hit after the European Commission decided to phase out subsidies for renewable energy by 2017. The installation of solar panels fell by nearly 60 percent in Germany in 2013 and by 70 percent in Italy.
Meanwhile, in the UK, less than 30 percent of early stage venture-capital-funded clean-tech deals were financed.
The truth is that we have been here before. The convulsions in the clean-tech sector are simply symptoms of a cycle that characterizes emerging technologies: excitement, inflated expectations and consolidation — ultimately followed by stability and the resumption of growth. Indeed, underlying recent developments are signs of a much more significant transformation: Clean tech is becoming commercially viable.
Confidence in the clean-tech sector’s future is rooted in the need for sustainable solutions for a planet that is supporting an ever-wealthier population. Over the next 20 years, the number of middle-class consumers is expected to rise to about 3 billion, from 1.8 billion today. Their new lifestyles will require resources, including energy.
This surge in demand will occur at a time when finding, developing and extracting new sources of energy and resources will be increasingly challenging and expensive.
Over the last 12 years, for example, the average real construction cost of an oil well has doubled, and in recent years, new mining discoveries have been few, despite the industry’s best (and often expensive) efforts.
However, clean energy costs are trending in the opposite direction, ripening these solutions at a time when need — particularly in some of the world’s largest developing cities — is becoming acute.
PEAKS AND VALLEYS
One pivotal question for the future of clean tech has been whether it needs regulatory support to thrive. To be sure, the withdrawal of subsidies in Europe hit the sector hard. However, even as Germany and Italy lost their first and second-place rankings in terms of new solar power installations, China and Japan took their place. Globally, the solar power industry has grown at an average annual rate of 57 percent since 2006.
Regulatory support has been effective in creating demand and allowing sources of renewable supply to reach scale. However, such support has not always been economically efficient.
One lesson from the German experience is that sudden changes in regulation can create peaks and valleys in demand that are not helpful to an industry that is still emerging.
The biggest risk in many markets is not that subsidies and other supports will be withdrawn, but that the regulatory structure will not adapt as the sector develops.
As industries mature, the case for policy support weakens. And, indeed, solar power increasingly appears to be able to survive without regulatory help.
A thriving global marketplace goes a long way toward leveling the playing field across all resource options.
During the past five years, dozens of solar manufacturing companies have failed, only to be replaced by stronger, more innovative and more efficient players.
More than one-quarter of cumulative global solar photovoltaic capacity was installed just in the past year.
The International Energy Agency, which has been conservative regarding solar energy’s prospects, now expects it to be the world’s largest power source by 2050.
Nonetheless, concerns about the future of clean tech have made new projects more difficult to finance.
However, innovative new schemes, such as clean-tech bonds and third-party financing, are changing the picture. Third-party ownership, in which a company installs and maintains solar panels in exchange for either a set monthly rate or a fixed price per unit of power, has driven up adoption rates in California, financing more than two-thirds of new installations in 2012 and 2013.
LEAN PRINCIPLES
Similarly, new partnerships with large industry incumbents — such as the tie-up between Daimler and Tesla and the controlling stake that Total took in SunPower — are reducing the cost of finance for smaller firms.
Meanwhile, clean-tech companies are becoming more sophisticated and creative. An entire new industry has been created around the use of information technology to reduce energy consumption. Some companies, such as C3 Energy, offer electric utilities software that can analyze their electrical networks to improve grid operations and asset utilization, thereby increasing profits.
Smart-grid hardware has been deployed widely in the past decade, and as companies figure out how to use big data and analytic tools, it will become much more important. Google’s acquisition of Nest Labs for US$3.2 billion is a good example of the value that companies are placing on this kind of data.
All of this adds up to an industry that Bloomberg calculates reached US$310 billion in investment last year. This is not a “niche” segment, but an asset-intensive industry on its way to commoditization.
Clean tech is maturing and adopting proven management practices in operations, marketing, sales and distribution. Increasingly, the industry is implementing approaches that have ensured success in other sectors, such as reducing procurement costs and deploying lean principles in manufacturing.
As clean-tech businesses continue to scale up, there will be additional opportunities to improve.
The shakeout in the clean-tech industry has been tough; but it has also been typical of emerging technologies, and, by weeding out the weaker players, it has made the sector more robust.
This is a global segment meeting a growing global need. There is little room for doubt that the clean-tech industry can expect plenty of sunny days ahead.
Jon Creyts is a managing director at Rocky Mountain Institute. Martin Stuchtey is director of the McKinsey Center for Business & Environment.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past