India and rape hit the headlines around the world again this week, to the chagrin of Indian officials. However, this time it was their actions, not those of the rapists, which created the fallout.
The crisis was caused by the documentary India’s Daughter, set to be aired on International Women’s Day tomorrow by BBC4’s Storyville series, which features an interview with one of the men convicted of a fatal gang rape in New Delhi in December 2012.
While the focus of the controversy has been comments made by Mukesh Singh in which he blames the victim, Jyoti Singh, for being out at night and for fighting back against her attackers, the film is more about the aftermath of the rape — the huge street protests in New Delhi and elsewhere, the impact on Jyoti’s parents, the suspects’ parents and India itself.
The Indian home minister banning the film from being shown in the country and talking about taking action against the BBC and YouTube is a classic example of shooting the messenger. His actions only resulted in the BBC showing the film four days ahead of schedule and it being uploaded repeatedly to YouTube.
Watching the documentary, viewers can see why Indian officials might feel anxious, but not because of Mukesh Singh’s attitude. His excuses have been made by rapists the world over. More disturbing are interviews with two of the defense attorneys.
M.L. Sharma says “we [India] have the best culture. In our culture, there is no place for a woman,” while A.P. Singh declares that if his daughter or sister were to engage in premarital sex, he would pour gasoline over her and set her alight in front of the entire family. He also claims that scores of Indian lawmakers have been charged with rape or similar crimes, but have yet to be tried.
Misogynistic comments by the educated elite are harder to dismiss than those made by the poor and uneducated. India’s Daughter highlights the fact that attackers of girls and women are empowered by societies in which women are seen as second-class citizens.
Rape happens in every society, and not just to females. It is about power and violence, not sex. However, rape is just one in a catalogue of assaults against women aimed at subjugating them, depriving them of their rights and of a life equal to males. It begins with gender-selective abortions and genital mutilation, and includes name-shaming and verbal abuse, sex trafficking, acid attacks, domestic violence and murder.
Brazilian lawmakers this week recognized the extent of the problem by approving a bill to recognize femicide as an aggravated form of homicide. The bill covers cases where a female has been killed following domestic violence or gender-based violence, and includes increased penalties if the victim was killed in front of family members. It has yet to be signed into law [ editor's note: Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff signed it into law on March 9], but it is a major step forward, and an example to other nations.
Ghopal Subramanium, a senior advocate for the Indian Supreme Court, who was also interviewed in India’s Daughter, took aim at those who would dismiss rapists as aberrations or monsters, or blame girls and women for being attacked.
“Nobody is a monster in that he is excluded from society; after all, any society that has these rapists has to take responsibility for them,” Subramanium said. However, his most telling words presaged the Indian home minister’s actions this week.
“When you do demand accountability, establishments feel highly threatened,” he said.
On the eve of International Women’s Day, Subramanium’s words hammer home some hard truths. Rape and female disenfranchisement do not happen in a vacuum. M.L. Sharma is wrong; there can be no culture if women are not part of it — an equal part.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past