They are out there, hiding in library stacks, whispering in lecture halls, armed with dangerous textbooks and subversive pop quizzes: foreign enemies plotting a stealthy academic invasion of Chinese universities.
So says Chinese Minister of Education Yuan Guiren (袁貴仁), who has been issuing dire alarms about the threat of foreign ideas on the nation’s college campuses, calling for a ban on textbooks that promote Western values and forbidding criticism of the Chinese Communist Party’s leadership in the classroom.
“Young teachers and students are key targets of infiltration by enemy forces,” he wrote on Feb. 2 in the elite party journal Seeking Truth, explaining that “some countries,” fearful of China’s rise, “have stepped up infiltration in more discreet and diverse ways.”
However, the government’s latest attempts to tighten controls over the nation’s intellectual discourse have raised concerns — and elicited rare open criticism — among teachers and students who reject the idea that foreign pedagogy and textbooks pose a threat to the government’s survival. Indeed, they say, one of the most vocal arguments against such controls came from the education minister himself.
Four years ago, he told a prominent government advisory panel that restricting the use of Western teaching materials was wrongheaded.
“No matter how many foreign resources we import, we will not be at risk, because we are on Chinese soil,” he said, according to a March 2011 article in the state-run Jinghua Times newspaper.
Referring to the hundreds of thousands of Chinese students who have gone overseas to study, he added: “We even sent so many people abroad and they were not affected in the nest of capitalism, so why fear they would be affected here?”
His stark reversal highlights the growing tension between academics and party officials over the future of Chinese studies, and has given ammunition to his critics.
“I’m just disappointed that the education minister does not have any backbone and is simply saying what his superiors want him to say,” said Helen Wu, 25, a graduate student at Shantou University in Guangdong Province.
To gird China’s impressionable young minds, Yuan has been championing new guidelines, issued last month, that call on the country’s higher-education institutions to prioritize the teaching of Marxism, ideological loyalty to the party and the views of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
He recently described Chinese schools as the “ideological front line” in a battle against concepts like rule of law, civil society and human rights. Any “wrong talk” in social science and philosophy forums, he said, must be silenced.
His colorful speech, which amplifies the talking points of internal documents that have been circulating over the past two years, appears so far to have had little concrete impact on the nation’s college campuses. Still, some academics expressed concern that such pronouncements would affect the quality of their teaching.
“Professors personally feel that they are unable to properly explain things to their students,” said a faculty member at Yunnan University, who asked not to be identified to avoid political repercussions. “They think: ‘Oh, these university students, it is such a pity they will not be able to learn anything good anymore. No wonder so many Chinese are willing to go abroad to study.’”
Others warned that Yuan’s remarks were reminiscent of the ideological purification campaigns of the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976, the decade of chaos and violence unleashed by Mao Zedong (毛澤東) that scarred a generation of Chinese intellectuals.
The notion that Western ideas are potentially subversive has been greeted with widespread incredulity, especially among Chinese intellectuals who note that Communism itself is a Western import.
Xia Yeliang (夏業良), a visiting fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington, said the campaign to vilify Western values was hypocritical.
“Was Karl Marx an Eastern person?” asked Xia, who was an economist at Peking University until 2013, when he was fired for what he says were his antiestablishment political views. “Weren’t Marxism and socialism adopted from the West?”
Both teachers and students, noting the growing surge of Chinese students studying abroad, say that China only stands to benefit from foreign ideas. In three years, the number of Chinese studying at US colleges soared 75 percent to more than 274,000 in the last academic year, making them the largest contingent of foreign students in the US, according to the Institute of International Education. Among them was the president’s daughter, who attended Harvard University, arguably the world’s most renowned bastion of liberal Western learning.
Until recently, Yuan appeared to be an ardent supporter of such exchanges
“We can learn from the outside,” he said in 2011. “Whether they are rich or poor, socialist or capitalist, as long as they are beneficial to our development, we can learn from all of them.”
Although many academics have kept their frustrations private to avoid losing their jobs, some have openly expressed concern that limiting the availability of foreign textbooks and stifling classroom discussion would undermine China’s quality of education.
In the wake of the education minister’s protest of Western textbooks last month, Shen Kui (沈巋), a professor at Peking University Law School in Beijing, one of the nation’s pre-eminent institutions, published a letter online challenging the minister “to clearly delineate the line between ‘Western values’ from Chinese values.”
Shen also warned the education minister not to violate China’s constitution or law in implementing the latest political decree, providing several handy constitutional quotes for easy reference, including the guarantee of “freedom to engage in scientific research, literary and artistic creation and other cultural pursuits.”
Party ideologues have counterattacked in the state media in recent days, demanding harsh punishment for would-be liberal enemies, including prominent entrepreneurs, lawyers, artists and professors.
In an editorial on Feb. 4, Zhu Jidong (朱繼東), an official in the National Cultural Security and Ideology Construction department at the China Academy of Social Sciences, said that the authorities must “eliminate the teachers who often publish criticism attacking the party and socialism before we can truly uphold virtue and condemn evil.”
On Feb. 2, Peking University pledged fealty to the party’s latest directives in an online commentary and warned students not to be “led by the wrong values from the West” in the classroom.
“Chinese universities are universities with socialist quality, so of course we should stick to socialist education,” it said on the school’s Web site.
Yet when asked about the presence of hostile foreign forces on campus, several students said they had seen nothing to raise suspicion.
Jimmy Bai (白吉米), 23, acknowledged using foreign textbooks in the university’s journalism course, but said he had encountered nothing subversive.
“As a regular college student,” he said, “I haven’t noticed anything.”
Dan Levin is a New York Times reporter based in Beijing.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers