“If I had arrived 15 minutes later at the hospital, I would have died. I underwent 12 blood transfusions in order to survive.” Sitting in the living room of her wooden stilt house, 39-year-old Buan Kham slowly lifts her skirt to expose what remains of her right leg, amputated at the knee.
“If I hadn’t gone to the capital, Vientiane, I would have lost both,” she adds, caressing the deep scars running along her left thigh.
Less than a year ago, Kham, from the rural village of Na Dee, became one of the 20,000 victims of unexploded ordnance (UXO). The weapons are a lethal legacy of the Vietnam War, which turned this poor, landlocked Southeast Asian nation of 6 million into the most bombed country per capita in the world.
It has been 50 years since the first US combat troops entered Vietnam in March 1965. During that notorious conflict, the US dropped more than 270 million bombs in Laos as part of a CIA-run, top-secret operation aimed at destroying the North Vietnamese supply routes along the Ho Chi Minh Trail and wiping out its local communist allies.
One-third of the bombs failed to explode on impact and have since claimed an average of 500 victims per year, mainly children and farmers forced to work on their contaminated fields to sustain their families. Despite tens of millions of dollars spent, only 1 percent of Laotian territory has been cleared so far.
In April last year, a Vietnamese metal dealer arrived in Na Dee to buy a 200kg bomb that Kham’s husband had stored under the family house. It had been found a few days earlier in a nearby forest, and he brought it home to sell as scrap metal, a common business that earns local families a few extra dollars. However, the bomb exploded when the dealer began to saw off its tail in order to remove some aluminum parts.
The dealer died instantly, his face blown away by the explosion.
Kham and her two sons, aged 16 and 18, had been sitting nearby. Enveloped in a thick cloud of dust, Kham did not realize she had also been hit until she was put on a truck and saw she was covered in blood. She passed out, regaining consciousness 12 hours later at the provincial hospital in Phonsavan — her leg had already been amputated.
Kham spent the next five weeks in another clinic in Vientiane, where she was given a prosthetic leg. She still struggles to get used to it.
“It is very heavy, I feel pain every time I use it,” she said. “I am not able to do anything with it and I just spend time at home.”
Her sons were both permanently wounded: one lost his left eye; the other injured his shoulder. As a result, her family is now in dire economic straits. She had to sell all seven of her cows to settle the hospital bill and is afraid her husband might abandon her for another woman.
“I am worried about my life,” she said in despair. “With both my sons handicapped, who will look after the family?”
SCARS OF WAR
The legacy of the Secret War, as the US operation is now known, is clearly visible in this idyllic landscape of rolling hills and lush tropical forest. Scarred by thousands of explosion craters, the contaminated area is estimated to be 87,000km2, more than one-third of Laos’ territory.
In Xieng Khouang, the most affected province, UXOs are found in forests and school buildings, roads and rice fields. Tim Lardner, the chief technical adviser of UXO Laos — the local company given the task of clearing the country — said: “I have been in this business for 25 years and I have worked in dozens of UXO-affected countries. When I go out in the field, my breath is taken away by the scale of the contamination. It’s like nothing anywhere else.”
According to Kingphet Phimmavong, the company’s provincial coordinator, 85 percent of UXOs found in Laos were left by the US.
For survivors of the war, such as 84-year-old Kampuang Dalaseng, memories are still vivid.
“I hate Americans to this date. They bombed, burned and destroyed everything. If their president was here, I would slap him in the face,” he said.
A former professor of French, he was forced to flee the bombardments, abandoning the village of Bat Ngot Ngum in 1964 and taking shelter in a forest cave with his family and fellow villagers.
Whenever the US bombers targeted the area the group would move, in an endless cat-and-mouse game. Exhausted and demoralized, the family fled to Vietnam in 1969, embarking on a month-long walk only four days after Dalaseng’s wife had given birth to her second baby. The landscape around them was apocalyptic.
“The bombs had destroyed everything,” he said. “There were no more animals or villages.”
The most commonly used ordnance by the US were cluster bombs, dropped in casings designed to open in mid-air and scatter hundreds of munitions over several hectares. The bombs were designed to explode on impact, lighting up the hills with thousands of simultaneous, deadly explosions. The bombardments were so intense — an average of one every eight minutes, for nine years — that farmers resorted to tending their fields at night. Cooking was severely restricted, because the smoke would attract the aircraft.
Despite their efforts to avoid detection, deaths were commonplace. On Nov. 24, 1968, more than 374 people were killed when A US fighter jet bombed the Tham Piu cave. Today, with its blackened walls and the hundreds of small stone altars erected in memory of the deceased, the place still retains an eerie atmosphere.
DEADLY AFTEREFFECTS
UXOs affect not only the daily life of millions of people, but the long-term development of the country by delaying the construction of clinics, schools and factories. At the current pace, it will take more than two millennia to clear the country.
About 40 percent of the victims are children, who are often attracted by the toy-like shapes of the unexploded cluster bombs. While statistics show risk education programs carried out by the Laotian authorities have contributed to a steep decline in casualties — from 300 in 2008 to 41 in 2013 — many accidents in remote areas often go unreported.
Last year, the Xieng Khouang provincial hospital alone dealt with 14 cases.
“The problem will last for long. UXO-injured patients feel the consequences their whole life,” said 55-year-old Bouanvanh Outhachack, the doctor in charge of the local surgery unit who has treated more than 500 UXO-related cases in 31 years.
Unexploded ordnance claimed the lives of both her grandparents and her mother.
“I decided to become a doctor after those accidents,” she said. “Even if I am tired and close to retirement, I still want to help people get back to life.”
Although the US is now the main UXO-clearance donor in Laos, the US$82 million allocated so far is only a small fraction of the US$18 million per day (inflation-adjusted) that Washington spent to bomb Laos.
From his leafy mansion in Vientiane, US Ambassador Daniel Clune is clearly uncomfortable when speaking about the issue.
“We cannot do anything to change the past, we cannot change the history,” he said. “What we can do is to address the current situation.”
In a historic visit in 2012, then-US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton referred to the war as “the tragic legacies of the past.” The US acknowledged its role in the conflict only indirectly, when it inaugurated a Laos memorial dedicated to the veterans of the Secret War in Arlington National Cemetery in 1997.
Nine years after he fled from Laos, Dalaseng was finally able to return to Bat Ngot Ngum, where he now runs a restaurant with his wife. Unable to forgive, like many other Laotians who experienced the war, the scars are too deep to heal.
“The only way the US can make amends is to clear this country, build roads, schools and hospitals,” he said. “Their bombs are still killing our people every day.”
THE LONG CAMPAIGN
1964: The US enters the Vietnam War, saying North Vietnamese patrol boats fired on two US Navy destroyers. The US begins a nine-year bombing campaign in Laos. The aerial bombardment is an attempt to destroy North Vietnamese sanctuaries and rupture the supply line known as the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
1965: 200,000 American combat troops arrive in South Vietnam. By 1967 the number has risen to 500,000.
1968: The Tet offensive — a combined assault by Vietcong fighters and the North Vietnamese army on US positions — begins. More than 500 civilians die in the US massacre at My Lai and thousands are killed by communist forces during their occupation of the city of Hue.
1969: North Vietnam’s leader Ho Chi Minh dies. Then-US president Nixon Richard begins to reduce US ground troops in Vietnam as public opposition to the war grows.
1973: Ceasefire agreement in Paris. US troop pullout is completed by March.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers