Alexis Tsipras, leader of the left-wing SYRIZA coalition, has just become prime minister of Greece. He is the first European leader elected on an explicit promise to challenge the economic austerity policies that have prevailed since 2010. And there are, of course, many people warning him to abandon that promise, to behave “responsibly.”
So how has that responsibility thing worked out so far?
To understand the political earthquake in Greece, it helps to look at Greece’s May 2010 “standby arrangement” with the IMF, under which the so-called “troika” — the IMF, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission — extended loans to the nation in return for a combination of austerity and reform.
It is a remarkable document, in the worst way. The troika, while pretending to be hardheaded and realistic, was peddling an economic fantasy; the Greek people have been paying the price for those elite delusions.
FANCIFUL PROJECTIONS
The economic projections that accompanied the standby arrangement assumed that Greece could impose harsh austerity polices with little effect on growth and employment.
Greece was in recession when the deal was reached, but the projections assumed that this downturn would end soon — that there would be only a small contraction in 2011, and that by 2012 Greece would be recovering. Unemployment, the projections conceded, would rise substantially, from 9.4 percent in 2009 to almost 15 percent in 2012, but would then begin coming down fairly quickly.
What actually transpired was an economic and human nightmare. Far from ending in 2011, the Greek recession gathered momentum. Greece did not hit the bottom until last year, and by that point had experienced a full-fledged depression, with overall unemployment rising to 28 percent and youth unemployment rising to almost 60 percent.
The recovery now under way, such as it is, is barely visible, offering no prospect of returning to pre-crisis living standards for the foreseeable future.
What went wrong? I fairly often encounter assertions to the effect that Greece did not carry through on its promises, that it failed to deliver the promised spending cuts.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
In reality, Greece imposed savage cuts in public services, wages of government workers and social benefits. Thanks to repeated further waves of austerity, public spending was cut much more than the original program envisaged and is currently about 20 percent lower than it was in 2010.
Yet Greek debt troubles are — if anything — worse than before the program started.
One reason is that the economic plunge has reduced revenues: The Greek government is collecting a substantially higher share of GDP in taxes than it used to, but GDP has fallen so quickly that the overall tax take is down.
Furthermore, the plunge in GDP has caused a key fiscal indicator, the ratio of debt to GDP, to keep rising even though debt growth has slowed and Greece received some modest debt relief in 2012.
THE ‘CONFIDENCE FAIRY’
Why were the original projections so wildly overoptimistic? Because supposedly hardheaded officials were in reality engaged in fantasy economics. Both the European Commission and the ECB decided to believe in the “confidence fairy” — that is, to claim that the direct job-destroying effects of spending cuts would be more than made up for by a surge in private-sector optimism.
The IMF was more cautious, but it nonetheless grossly underestimated the damage that austerity would do.
And here is the thing: If the troika had been truly realistic, it would have acknowledged that it was demanding the impossible.
Two years after the Greek program began, the IMF looked for historical examples where Greek-type programs, attempts to pay down debt through austerity without major debt relief or inflation, had been successful. It did not find any.
So now that Tsipras has won, and won big, European officials would be well advised to skip the lectures calling on him to act responsibly and to go along with their program. They have no credibility; the program they imposed on Greece never made sense. It had no chance of working.
PUSH THE ENVELOPE
If anything, the problem with SYRIZA’s plans may be that they are not radical enough. Debt relief and an easing of austerity would reduce the economic pain, but it is doubtful whether they are sufficient to produce a strong recovery. On the other hand, it is not clear what more any Greek government can do unless it is prepared to abandon the euro, and the Greek public is not ready for that.
Still, in calling for a major change, Tsipras is being far more realistic than officials who want the beatings to continue until morale improves.
The rest of Europe should give him a chance to end his nation’s nightmare.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from