China’s unilateral declaration of its new air routes in close proximity to the Taiwan Strait median line poses a serious threat to Taiwan’s national and flight security, and is detrimental to cross-strait relations. However, the government’s slow and weak response to such tyranny is even more frustrating.
Bullying of all kinds must be met with strong protest or counteractive measures. Faced with such invasive and barbaric actions by the Chinese, the government should respond appropriately, such as by ceasing all exchanges or talks with Beijing.
However, with the exception of lawmakers from both the ruling and opposition parties who expressed strong objections in the legislature, the Ministry of Defense has only said that it is opposed to the idea, the Civil Aeronautics Administration said it is unacceptable and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs opined that since the new routes are not actually in use yet, there is still room for changes to be made.
As for the president and the Executive Yuan, there is nothing but the sound of silence.
It is hard to believe that this is the same government that said it would go to war if necessary when addressing the dispute with Japan over fishing rights around the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
As for the Mainland Affairs Council, it is the weakest weakling of all, for it not only expressed no opposition whatsoever on this matter, but even defended China, saying that the follow-up of this issue should not affect other matters between Taiwan and China.
It is like someone just got punched in the gut, but instead of fighting back or asking the assailant to stop, just swallowed the insult and suggested that the punches did not hurt.
This is a reminder of Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi’s (王郁琦) first visit to China to meet Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) in Nanjing, which the media had labeled the “meeting of the century.”
When the time to meet came, Zhang remained motionless with an impassive smile; Wang, on the other hand, quickly stepped forward, his face beaming, almost like a Pekingese greeting its master, and shook Zhang’s hands eagerly.
Wang’s despicable and contemptible manner could not have been more humiliating to Taiwanese. Kneeling before the Chinese whenever there is a chance to do so is typical of the Ma administration.
In recent years, China has attempted to change the “status quo” and consolidate the changes. Challenged, the government neither objected nor responded, but merely “negotiated” with the Chinese.
Once Chinese fallacies become facts, the eagerness for negotiation is only supplication from the weak to the strong for mercy so that the weak can be spared from misery.
The way the government dealt with this problem is to plead with the Chinese to inch the air routes westward. As a matter of fact, unless all the air routes are completely readjusted, simply moving the new routes westward will not solve the problem.
Can Taiwanese continue to tolerate such a government that lacks integrity, courage and competence?
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS