China’s unilateral declaration of its new air routes in close proximity to the Taiwan Strait median line poses a serious threat to Taiwan’s national and flight security, and is detrimental to cross-strait relations. However, the government’s slow and weak response to such tyranny is even more frustrating.
Bullying of all kinds must be met with strong protest or counteractive measures. Faced with such invasive and barbaric actions by the Chinese, the government should respond appropriately, such as by ceasing all exchanges or talks with Beijing.
However, with the exception of lawmakers from both the ruling and opposition parties who expressed strong objections in the legislature, the Ministry of Defense has only said that it is opposed to the idea, the Civil Aeronautics Administration said it is unacceptable and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs opined that since the new routes are not actually in use yet, there is still room for changes to be made.
As for the president and the Executive Yuan, there is nothing but the sound of silence.
It is hard to believe that this is the same government that said it would go to war if necessary when addressing the dispute with Japan over fishing rights around the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
As for the Mainland Affairs Council, it is the weakest weakling of all, for it not only expressed no opposition whatsoever on this matter, but even defended China, saying that the follow-up of this issue should not affect other matters between Taiwan and China.
It is like someone just got punched in the gut, but instead of fighting back or asking the assailant to stop, just swallowed the insult and suggested that the punches did not hurt.
This is a reminder of Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi’s (王郁琦) first visit to China to meet Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) in Nanjing, which the media had labeled the “meeting of the century.”
When the time to meet came, Zhang remained motionless with an impassive smile; Wang, on the other hand, quickly stepped forward, his face beaming, almost like a Pekingese greeting its master, and shook Zhang’s hands eagerly.
Wang’s despicable and contemptible manner could not have been more humiliating to Taiwanese. Kneeling before the Chinese whenever there is a chance to do so is typical of the Ma administration.
In recent years, China has attempted to change the “status quo” and consolidate the changes. Challenged, the government neither objected nor responded, but merely “negotiated” with the Chinese.
Once Chinese fallacies become facts, the eagerness for negotiation is only supplication from the weak to the strong for mercy so that the weak can be spared from misery.
The way the government dealt with this problem is to plead with the Chinese to inch the air routes westward. As a matter of fact, unless all the air routes are completely readjusted, simply moving the new routes westward will not solve the problem.
Can Taiwanese continue to tolerate such a government that lacks integrity, courage and competence?
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS