A few days ago, I made an announcement that I would not attend any of the Greater Tainan Council meetings until corruption cases against newly elected Tainan Council Speaker Lee Chuan-chiao (李全教) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are settled. I did so to safeguard Tainan’s dignity and to increase society’s engagement with local politics.
With the intention of transforming local politics, I propose using information transparency to promote an open government, which will make up for the shortcomings of the current system of representative politics in the municipality.
By stressing transparency in information disclosure, the decisionmaking process and service provision, the public can directly oversee and become involved in government. With the prevalence of the Internet, disclosure of government information not only makes civil oversight a possibility, but also, and perhaps more importantly, facilitates actual civic engagement.
An open government will not only be able to foster oversight through transparency, but also further civic participation and collaboration between the private and the public sectors. The civil movements that have taken place in recent years, including the Sunflower movement, validate the necessity of a transparent government.
Unlike in the past, information disclosure alone is not sufficient, for incomplete or static information can no longer meet the needs for civic engagement. The information has to be fully disclosed, as well as be easily and readily accessible and applicable. Only then can civic engagement be a reality.
When bribery is involved in local politics, the basis of a representative democracy is compromised, city councils will fail to represent the public will and public welfare is left by the wayside. This is what is happening in Tainan, and that is why I have proposed an open government that can deepen civic oversight and engagement to make Tainan’s government one that is truly governed by the people, and a democratic system that is shared by city residents.
This is brand-new thinking for a democracy, utilizing technology as the interface for civic engagement, and this form of democratic government will be transparent, engaging and collaborative. Based on these concepts, we have made public on the city government’s official Web site hundreds of compilations of information for the past year, and we will publish more policy information in the future for the public to oversee and review.
We will also invite the public to take part in the city government’s plan for transparent information. Over time, we will systematically realize the goal of an open government. Ultimately, we want all government information to be fully disclosed.
Furthermore, the city government will set up channels to directly communicate with citizens, such as complete, live broadcasts of city council meetings and mayoral conferences, and the continuation of the annual district meetings in which district councilors have face-to-face conversations with borough officers and residents.
Councilors will no longer be able to shirk their responsibility as supervisors, and will themselves be subject to public scrutiny.
William Lai is the mayor of Greater Tainan.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS