Taiwanese have long been concerned about China’s infringement of its space on the international stage. Now they have to be worried about its increasing infringement on the nation’s air space.
In yet another slap in the face to Taipei, Beijing this week said that as of the beginning of March, it would add four new air routes to reduce congestion between Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta. The crucial north-south route, labeled M503, would run nearly parallel to the median line of the Taiwan Strait and come as close as 7.8km to it.
That Beijing made the announcement without consulting Taiwanese authorities in advance was yet another sign that it pays only lip service to the idea of cross-strait negotiations and dealing with Taipei as an equal. The comment by a spokesman for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office that the nation should show “more understanding and less suspicion” was a prime example of Chinese superciliousness.
Taiwanese authorities say the proposed routes would conflict with existing ones. While the new routes would fall under the jurisdiction of the Shanghai Flight Information Region (FIR), the nearness of M503 to the Taipei FIR means that Taiwanese air traffic controllers would have to worry about it, especially during bad weather.
The Taipei FIR, which covers 180,000 square nautical miles (about 617,383km2), is responsible for some of the busiest airspace in the region. It is bordered by Japan’s Fukuoka FIR, the Hong Kong FIR, the Shanghai FIR and the Manila FIR, and its western boundary runs close to the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
In 2013, it was estimated that about 1.3 million flights carrying 40 million travelers pass through the Taipei FIR annually. Air traffic, both passenger and cargo, has only grown since then.
Minister of Foreign Affairs David Lin (林永樂) said the government has protested to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) over the new routes and urged Beijing to negotiate on the issue with Taipei. However, Beijing said it had already cleared the four routes with the ICAO — although one Chinese official added that it was willing to “communicate” with Taipei over the matter.
This incident is another reminder of the nation’s impotence because of its exclusion from membership in UN-related organizations and agencies since the Republic of China lost its UN seat in 1971.
The government hailed its ability to send representatives to the ICAO assembly in October 2013 for the first time in decades as a breakthrough resulting from its efforts to ease cross-strait tensions, but the truth is that they were only there as “guests” of the ICAO council president because China had blocked efforts by the US and several other nations for Taiwan to gain even observer status in the organization.
It is hard not to see this week’s actions as a follow-up to the November 2013 declaration of an air defense identification zone over a large portion of the East China Sea. Beijing has once again shown that it is not willing to be, or interested in being, a team player or a responsible actor on either a regional or global stage. It just keeps nibbling away, pushing the boundaries and hoping that others will be too intimidated to push back.
The Chinese move to unilaterally establish air routes is not something that Beijing can claim to be “a purely domestic affair.” Aviation traffic safety is an international concern and relies upon smoothly integrated teamwork by air traffic controllers from neighboring nations, who must respect and trust each other’s decisions.
There has been a lot of press in China recently about the bad behavior of Chinese air passengers as well as tourists abroad, with the government considering publishing a national blacklist to shame travelers into behaving in a “more civilized” manner to earn international respect. It is clearly a lesson that has yet to be learned at the top in Beijing as well.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers