What happens to a house if it is left for 16 years without thorough sweeping, vacuuming and cleaning? It would become filthy and messy, with heavy dust. By the same logic, the public wonders whether the Taipei City Government has gathered cobwebs after having been managed by the same party for 16 years.
After comments by Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) over the prior administration’s way of doing business, unnoticed issues are now in the spotlight.
One concerns how former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) administration appeared to be quite a spendthrift with taxpayers’ money.
While inspecting the construction of an athletes’ village for the 2017 Summer Universiade, Ko — and many Taiwanese — were stunned to find out that some of the village’s amenities, estimated to cost NT$2.6 billion (US$81.78 million), are to be removed right after the 12-day event.
In 2011, when Hau announced that the capital would host the event, he pledged a total budget of almost NT$40 billion. A budget of NT$36.8 billion was eventually allotted, with the athletes’ village in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口) set to be turned into welfare housing units after the Universiade.
The municipal government estimated that NT$2.6 billion would be needed to rebuild and remodel the site from athletes’ accommodation into housing units.
In other words, that huge sum is to be spent for a mere 12-day stay — the absurdity is simply flabbergasting.
While Taipei New Construction Department Director Huang Chih-feng (黃治峰), has said that NT$1.1 billion of the NT$2.6 billion would not be wasted — as furniture, air conditioners and the like would be reused — who is to guarantee that these items will indeed be reused and not end up in storage, wasted?
If Hau’s administration had given the plan more careful thought with a keen conscience toward looking after taxpayers’ money, imagine how such spending could have been avoided.
For instance, if a university were given NT$300 million to renovate a dormitory, imagine how many schools and students could benefit.
According to the municipal government’s estimate, the Universiade will generate NT$10 billion in tourism revenue. Does this benefit the capital as a whole?
This brings to mind the Ko administration’s demolition of the exclusive bus lanes in front of Taipei Railway Station last month. While Hau’s administration estimated that the demolition would cost NT$6 million, NT$4.1 million was all it took for Ko to get the task done.
In light of this example, many cannot help wondering that if the range between the estimated and actual cost is that big for a project such as the bus lane, how big might be the margin of budgeting errors for Taipei’s bigger public projects — and how much taxpayers’ money has been squandered?
During his mayoral campaign, Ko pledged: “All public servants, including top officials, no longer need to serve any particular political party or ideology; they do not even need to serve the mayor, and should serve only the people of Taipei.”
“Let us begin to change Taiwan from Taipei and let us change Taipei by changing the culture,” has been another slogan trumpeted by Ko.
Hopefully the new Taipei administration, under Ko’s leadership, lives up to his promises and the public’s expectations, genuinely working to serve residents’ best interests by looking after taxpayers’ hard-earned money and clamping down on irregularities.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers