The controversy over the flag-raising ceremony at Twin Oaks Estate in Washington on New Year’s Day cast doubt on whether Taiwan-US relations are really as cordial as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has claimed they are as a result of his “flexible diplomacy” policy, and debunks the myth that putting the nation at the disposal of great powers can deliver Taiwan the Earth.
As China continues its rise as a global power, the US, under its pivot toward Asia strategy, has gone to great lengths to bolster its cooperation with countries in the region to contain China’s ambition, which has been characterized by assertiveness.
What the US sees as Taiwan’s role in the changing dynamics has been shrouded in uncertainty. Not only is the neglect of Taiwan in its implementation of the pivot plain to see, growing concern over China’s rising power sometimes reaches the point where arguments are made that the US should abandon Taiwan.
The only certainty is that the maintenance of stable relations with China is what the US expects from Taiwan, even if that comes at a high price to the nation’s sovereignty. Since the Ma administration also places a high priority on developing cross-strait relations, it has been able to live up to the US’ expectations.
In some cases, the Ma administration even went further than expected in compromising sovereignty. A notable example was the name under which Taiwan participated in the 38th International Civil Aviation Organization Assembly (ICAO) in September 2013, which the nation’s delegation attended as a “guest.”
Since more than a year before the event, the US had pushed for Taiwan to be granted “observer status” at the ICAO, which culminated in a July 2013 law under which the US mission to the ICAO was required to officially petition for Taiwan’s participation at the assembly and in other activities. The development offered the most promising hope for the nation’s participation at the ICAO, but Ma decided to accept the “guest” formula suggested by China, resulting in Taiwan’s sovereignty being undermined.
The flag-raising ceremony was hosted by the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO), with Representative to the US Shen Lyu-shun (沈呂巡) taking the chance to confer Order of Loyalty and Diligence medals on four officials from the Ministry of Defense’s mission in the US.
Although the events might be politically sensitive neither move was supposed to be important enough to provoke such a fierce response.
To begin with, there were precedents. The flag was flown at Twin Oaks Estate when Shen hosted a reception to mark the 103rd National Day reception on Oct. 8 last year — although there was no flag-raising ceremony on that occasion — and a medal ceremony was held on Armed Forces Day on Sept. 3 last year. The US did not raise objections to either event at the time.
TECRO, including its property and personnel, was determined by the US Department of State as a “foreign mission” on March 14 last year, as shown in Vol 79, No. 56 of the US Federal Register Notices, under which, according to Shen, unfurling the flag at TECRO and its subsidiary offices is one of Taiwan’s rights.
If sovereignty were not the issue that the Ma administration seems to care the least about, would the US have had such a harsh negative reaction? In addition to appeasing China, could it be that the US might use the incident to get the upper hand in negotiations over trade irritants in relations with Taiwan?
Whatever the incentives were for the US to respond in a way that some commentators have termed an “overreaction,” the Ma administration owes the public a statement of support for TECRO. It should also come to the realization that being a non-troublemaker is not enough to sustain a relationship with the US if there is no substantial progress on issues for mutual benefits to be enjoyed.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past