Over the past few weeks, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has been swamped by allegations of dubious relations with Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團). Despite the Presidential Office’s repeated denials, dismissing the claims as fabricated accusations, public doubts over Ma’s integrity continue to grow as more allegations surface.
Following separate claims by political commentators Wu Tsu-chia (吳子嘉) and radio host Clara Chou (周玉蔻), as well as allegations by Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) and People First Party Deputy Secretary-General Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) late last month accusing Ma of having received political donations from conglomerates under the table — a case now under investigation by the Special Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office — a new allegation surfaced this week, questioning the cash flow handled by foundations set up by Ma.
Ma founded the New Taiwanese Cultural Foundation (新台灣人基金會) after he was elected Taipei mayor in 1998, then the Dwen An Social Welfare Foundation (敦安社會基金會) in 1999.
Accusing the New Taiwanese Cultural Foundation of having capital amounting to NT$1 billion (US$31.3 million), Chou on Monday questioned the foundation’s cash flow and aired suspicions over both foundations’ roles during Ma’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012.
While the New Taiwanese Cultural Foundation has denied Chou’s claim, saying it holds capital of just NT$20 million, the crux of the allegation — as Chou has said — lies not in the amount itself, but in the flow of money the foundation has handled.
Chou said she suspects dummy accounts have been set up to handle under-the-table donations.
Amid the snowballing allegations questioning the president’s integrity, the latest statement released by former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) dismissing claims that he acted as a guardian angel, or men shen (門神), for the Wei (魏) family that owns Ting Hsin, if anything, only made things look more suspicious.
After chiding Chou last week for accusing him of having “special relations” with the Wei family, Lo eventually came forward on Tuesday — right before the latest edition of the Chinese-language Next Magazine hit the shelves yesterday reporting the revelation — acknowledging that he did, after all, “have interactions” with Ting Hsin executive Wei Ying-chiao (魏應交) four times in 2013 during his stint as the Presidential Office deputy secretary-general.
Despite Lo’s claim the four exchanges were nothing but innocent meetings, the time period mentioned raised many skeptical eyebrows, given that it was about the time that Ting Hsin’s telecom subsidiary, Taiwan Star Cellular Corp (台灣之星), was bidding for a 4G license, as well as when Ting Hsin was seeking to acquire cable television operator China Network Systems Co (CNS, 中嘉寬頻), which serves nearly 30 percent of cable television customers in the nation.
“Highest moral standards” has been a popular catchphrase for Ma. At this point, even if Ma truly knew nothing about Lo’s conduct, now that Lo has owned up to it, should Ma not be livid and demanding an explanation from Lo?
The lack of any action from Ma in addressing these allegations against him and his close aides, other than hiding behind press releases, only serves to fuel public annoyance and anger over lax supervision of his officials, as well as further eroding the public’s trust and respect for him as the head of state.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS