On Aug. 14 last year, former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) announced the establishment of the “Taiwanese Alliance of Peace and Neutrality,” which champions a new nation of peace and neutrality and promotes permanent peace between itself and China.
In light of that spirit, this essay will shed some light on the situation the world would face if all nations were neutral states.
All forms of life depend on solar energy for survival. All natural resources on the planet belong to all humans and the other living organisms. All life is in the same boat — in good times and in bad — so humans should conduct themselves peacefully with one another in the circle of life.
However, societies “draw circles” and form what are called “nations.” Once a nation is formed, resources must be used limitlessly and endlessly for its protection; weapons are made to kill others. This is the height of stupidity.
Based on estimates provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, world military expenditure in 2012 totaled US$1.735 trillion, about 2.5 percent of global GDP.
Taiwan’s national defense spending between 1960 and 2013 was US$10.15 trillion, as adjusted by the GDP deflator, making the average annual expenditure on weapons US$188 billion, between 1.92 and 9.56 percent of the nation’s annual GDP.
If all nations were neutral states, military spending could be considerably reduced and reallocated toward improving people’s welfare globally.
The UN has insisted on the idea that public outlays would be better used in health and education. According to a 1982 Thorsson report titled The Relationship Between Disarmament and Development, the arms race represents a waste of resources and hinders economic growth.
Much empirical research has also found that military expenditure has a crowding-out effect on productive investment, human capital investment, research and development investment, and public expenditure and consumption expenditure. As a result, economic growth has suffered. In other words, military expenditure comes at a high opportunity cost, because the arms race comes at the expense of public spending and productive investment.
If one day all nations became neutral states, all arms spending would greatly diminish. The result would be a greater improvement of welfare for all societies, as the “peace bonus” will be enormous.
Yang Chung-hsin is dean of Chinese Culture University’s College of Environmental Design.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US