Following the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) landslide victory in last month’s elections, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) warned the party to be cautious.
Democratic elections are decided at the ballot box and voters expressed their view of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) performance with their votes. The DPP’s big victory does not necessarily mean that voters approve of the DPP’s performance. Opposition parties have no policy track record to defend, so the victory had cost the DPP nothing — many people unwilling to vote for the KMT simply voted for the DPP instead. These swing voters helped the DPP to an unexpected landslide victory, but that does not mean they will vote for the DPP in the next election.
The elections reset everything and the competition begins anew. Taipei mayor-elect Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has broken new ground using Internet voting to select department directors, and although social activist Lai Hsiang-ling (賴香伶) was chosen to head the city’s labor department, the selection process was criticized for being open to manipulation. Ko’s approach to appointing officials is innovative, but he admits that the system has taken a beating and only time will tell if it is successful. In the end, Ko will have to take full political responsibility for the outcome. The selection of Ni Chung-hua (倪重華) as director of the department of culture was criticized by many of the city’s political advisers, who then resigned in protest. Criticism was also directed at Taipei Department of Urban Development director-designate Lin Jou-min (林洲民) for not being a licensed architect. Even before taking office, Ko has managed to upset many people.
The DPP is now in charge of more local governments and has more politically active officials. Still, taking responsibility for policy implementation is also the first step toward losing popularity. When Greater Taichung mayor-elect Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) announced that former minister of transportation and communications Lin Ling-san (林陵三) would be made deputy mayor, the decision was criticized as less than ideal, because Lin is over 70, and it was said that his past policies and private integrity are questionable.
In contrast, KMT reform is getting under way. New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) is the only candidate for the party chairmanship election, and he has proposed reforms to party affairs. His views differ from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) when it comes to issues such as returning party assets and dealing with former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), which would lead to political reconciliation, and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng’s (王金平) KMT membership, which could affect party unity. He has also suggested amending the Constitution and introducing a Cabinet system to take the initiative for such reform.
Premier Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) replaced former premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), and past controversial policies such as fuel and electricity price hikes, consumer price increases and the capital gains tax on securities transactions are now being dealt with. Oil prices are falling weekly, electricity fees are to be refunded and the capital gains tax might be postponed for three years. The government used to be slow in reacting to public opinion, but it is now responding faster and with more sensitivity. Perhaps this will alleviate some of the public’s dissatisfaction.
Political parties are fighting over democratic truths and voters are deciding who is right at the ballot box. It is too early to say that the outcome of last month’s elections was a result of the political pendulum swinging. The only thing that can be said is that the KMT’s popularity was at a low at the time of the vote, but voters and the DPP’s performance will decide if the KMT will continue to sink or if things will take a turn for the better. Trends can be broken and flows can turn; as long as the ruling and opposition parties do their job, things can change. Voters will provide the carrot and the stick.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US