The Nov. 29 elections were valuable because they went against the rule of thumb and carried huge positive significance. All that seemed right yet impossible in the past was highlighted by these elections, and this is worth a further response.
The legislative electoral system is unfair, but because the threshold required to amend the Constitution is too high, any such attempts have long been abandoned. Now the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has collapsed and we face legislative elections in just over a year. The current electoral system has been in place for two consecutive elections and it is clear that it favors the biggest party: The greater the portion of the vote a party wins, the more additional seats it gets.
There is no way the KMT will be able to turn things around before the next legislative elections. Following this system, the bigger the loss, the more additional seats they stand to lose, since the winner’s extra seats are taken from the loser. This effect was on clear display the first time the double ballot system was implemented in 2008. That year, the pan-blue camp won 56 percent of the vote, but 75 percent of the legislative seats.
Suppose that there are 100 seats in the legislature. With the current system, 70 of those seats would be decided in electoral districts, while the remaining 30 would be divided according to the number of votes a party receives. Also assume that there are only two parties, and that the KMT wins only 13 seats in the electoral districts, while it does quite well in overall party vote numbers, getting 40 percent of all votes cast. This would give the party 40 percent of the 30 seats divided based on the party vote, or 12 seats, giving it 25 seats in total.
If the Constitution is amended to adopt the German mixed-member proportional representation system, in which the number of seats awarded to a party must be equal to the proportion of the vote the party won, the KMT would receive 40 seats, having won 40 percent of the vote.
With the current system, the KMT would have received 25 seats in this example, but the German system would have given them 40 seats. As the loser, you lose 15 seats, just like that. Hopefully the people in the KMT’s think tanks studying comparative electoral systems report this difference. Pushing for an unfair election system is certain to come back to haunt you. The only way to promote a sustainable system is to work toward fairness.
Some people say it is not possible to amend the Constitution because the threshold is too high, but the seventh constitutional amendment shows that it is not a problem to gain three-fourths support as long as a legislative consensus can be reached. Furthermore, if no changes are made, that would clearly be disadvantageous to the KMT.
This change would be too late to implement in time for the 2016 elections, but if the KMT does nothing now, and then suffers in the 2016 elections, one can only wonder if they will receive fair treatment in 2020 or be able to turn their situation around.
As for a referendum, the seventh constitutional amendment, which introduced the electoral changes, was voted on by the now defunct National Assembly the following year. The only thing required to pass this simple request for fairness is a consensus between parties to pass a constitutional amendment during the first half of next year and commit to holding a referendum together with the presidential and legislative elections half a year later.
If that were the case, there would be no problem surpassing the referendum threshold of 50 percent participation. The key thing is the consensus.
Christian Fan Jiang is deputy convener of the Northern Taiwan Society’s legal and political group.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US