The transmission of messages from the future is a popular theme of science fiction movies.
Here are some ideas about what a possible future for Taiwan would look like.
The first concerns what would happen if, when polling stations have closed on Saturday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has lost both Taipei and Greater Taichung.
This eventuality would result in more than 13 million Taiwanese living in areas governed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or independent candidates.
If the KMT also loses Changhua County, the population under the sway of the pan-blue camp would drop below 9 million.
The two main political camps would once again enter a highly competitive period and it would be very difficult to predict the winner of the 2016 presidential election.
Each of the major parties — and perhaps even the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — would have to stand up to strict public scrutiny, in terms of their moral characters and integrity and their cross-strait, industrial, social and other policies.
In this parallel universe, the next two years would offer a great opportunity for promoting social advancement.
In the book Bomb Generation (崩世代), my collaborators and I suggest that the nation is set to face a serious economic and social crisis as the country is taken over by big business, slides into national debt, poverty among young people rises, birth rates drop and the population grows older.
The Sunflower movement also stressed the nation’s excessive reliance on cross-strait trade, and the consequences of a closed and rigid representative democracy.
It is also important to bear in mind how the food scandal involving Ting Hsin International Group’s (頂新國際集團) use of adulterated oil highlighted the negative effects of the exchange of power and money between the rich and privileged on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is in dire need of political and social reform.
Reforms necessary include the imposition of higher taxes on the wealthy; suppressing housing prices as a way to address the the wealth divide; lowering the voting age; legislative reform that could address the number of legislators; support for Taiwan-centered renewal; encouragement of young entrepreneurs; the establishment of a long-term care system that could include reform of the retirement pension system and an expansion of public kindergartens.
Each of these measures would allow the nation to move one step closer to a more open and equal society, encourage innovation among the younger generation and facilitate sustainable economic and environmental development.
Increasing competition between political parties and politicians would force local governments to renew policies and encourage public participation, and the central government — and perhaps even foreign forces — would also have to respond actively to public opinion.
In an alternative future, the KMT wins Taipei, Greater Taichung and Changhua County and is unassailable.
If this were to happen, weaker groups that wanted to challenge a world ruled by the rich and privileged would have to resort to the same methods now used by laid-off factory workers and farmers who have lost their land — lying down on railroad tracks, blocking roads, going on hunger strike or committing suicide to get the attention of the government and the media.
Which future do we want?
Lin Thung-hong is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS