The transmission of messages from the future is a popular theme of science fiction movies.
Here are some ideas about what a possible future for Taiwan would look like.
The first concerns what would happen if, when polling stations have closed on Saturday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has lost both Taipei and Greater Taichung.
This eventuality would result in more than 13 million Taiwanese living in areas governed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or independent candidates.
If the KMT also loses Changhua County, the population under the sway of the pan-blue camp would drop below 9 million.
The two main political camps would once again enter a highly competitive period and it would be very difficult to predict the winner of the 2016 presidential election.
Each of the major parties — and perhaps even the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — would have to stand up to strict public scrutiny, in terms of their moral characters and integrity and their cross-strait, industrial, social and other policies.
In this parallel universe, the next two years would offer a great opportunity for promoting social advancement.
In the book Bomb Generation (崩世代), my collaborators and I suggest that the nation is set to face a serious economic and social crisis as the country is taken over by big business, slides into national debt, poverty among young people rises, birth rates drop and the population grows older.
The Sunflower movement also stressed the nation’s excessive reliance on cross-strait trade, and the consequences of a closed and rigid representative democracy.
It is also important to bear in mind how the food scandal involving Ting Hsin International Group’s (頂新國際集團) use of adulterated oil highlighted the negative effects of the exchange of power and money between the rich and privileged on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan is in dire need of political and social reform.
Reforms necessary include the imposition of higher taxes on the wealthy; suppressing housing prices as a way to address the the wealth divide; lowering the voting age; legislative reform that could address the number of legislators; support for Taiwan-centered renewal; encouragement of young entrepreneurs; the establishment of a long-term care system that could include reform of the retirement pension system and an expansion of public kindergartens.
Each of these measures would allow the nation to move one step closer to a more open and equal society, encourage innovation among the younger generation and facilitate sustainable economic and environmental development.
Increasing competition between political parties and politicians would force local governments to renew policies and encourage public participation, and the central government — and perhaps even foreign forces — would also have to respond actively to public opinion.
In an alternative future, the KMT wins Taipei, Greater Taichung and Changhua County and is unassailable.
If this were to happen, weaker groups that wanted to challenge a world ruled by the rich and privileged would have to resort to the same methods now used by laid-off factory workers and farmers who have lost their land — lying down on railroad tracks, blocking roads, going on hunger strike or committing suicide to get the attention of the government and the media.
Which future do we want?
Lin Thung-hong is an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
Translated by Perry Svensson
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
RSS