Sub-Saharan Africa’s economies have boomed in recent years. However, the headline figures often mask longer-term problems — not least, an over-reliance on natural resources and chronic inequalities. Inclusive, sustainable growth is achievable, but only by tapping the continent’s greatest reserve of energy and creativity: African women and girls.
Health and development experts, economists, non-governmental organizations, UN agencies and banks agree that the key to unlocking Africa’s potential lies in expanding women’s education, freedom and job opportunities.
Today, many African women are not only expected to fulfill traditional roles, such as raising children and caring for the elderly; they also face legal and social discrimination regarding land and property ownership, inheritance, education, and access to credit and technology — in addition to oppressive sexual mores and violence.
Yet gender equality is necessary for the continent’s wellbeing. Consider the pressing issue of food security. Women comprise half of the agriculture sector’s workforce, growing, selling, buying and preparing food for their families. Studies suggest that equal access to resources would increase farm yields by 20 percent to 30 percent, offsetting the effects of drought and climate change. Access to education, capital, markets and technologies would allow women to process, package and market their products, especially for Africa’s growing middle class, bolstering both earnings and food supplies.
Agriculture is but one example. Greater female participation in male-dominated occupations across the board would increase overall labor productivity by up to 25 percent. The same is true of politics, where more female participation and leadership would improve governance and public services, as promising experiences in some parts of Africa and elsewhere have shown.
The first step to improving conditions for women must be to strengthen their sexual and reproductive health and rights — an issue concerning which Africa has some of the world’s worst indicators. Simply put, women must be allowed to decide, free of coercion or violence, about their sexuality and health; if, when and whom to marry; and whether and when to become a parent.
This cannot happen without providing women and girls with the information, education and services they need to make their own decisions.
Sexual and reproductive health issues exact a huge yet largely avoidable toll on African women, their families and communities. The costs usually strike in the prime of women’s economically productive lives, devaluing their future contributions to society. At the extreme, more than 400 African women and girls die every day during pregnancy or childbirth, scarring families and plunging surviving children into hardship.
Many of these deaths are caused by the estimated 5 million unsafe abortions carried out annually in Sub-Saharan Africa. The cost to society in lost income from death and disability is nearly US$1 billion. Almost all of these deaths occur in countries with restrictive abortion laws, which African leaders should consider reforming as a matter of common sense and social justice.
A prime focus should be on protecting the most vulnerable — adolescent girls. More than one-third of African girls marry before the age of 18, which threatens their health, truncates their education and lowers their aspirations for the future. They are also more likely than older women to die of birth-related complications and are more prone to abuse. Though most African states outlaw early or forced marriages, enforcement is weak.
African girls are also disproportionately vulnerable to contracting HIV/AIDS. About 90 percent of the world’s pregnant women and children with HIV/AIDS live in Africa and, despite notable recent reductions in HIV transmission rates, adolescent girls are still more than twice as likely as boys of the same age to carry the virus. Yet barely a third of young Africans know how to prevent HIV/AIDS — another reason for urgent and comprehensive sexuality education.
Another epidemic afflicting African women is violence, all too often perpetrated with impunity. Sexual violence is used as a tactic of war. However, it is also a disturbing feature of home life; 37 percent of African women report having been abused by their partner. In the case of female genital mutilation and child marriage, such violence is culturally sanctioned. We must change laws, judicial systems and attitudes that exonerate the perpetrators, and we must provide help to victims.
Attitudes can change. Contraception, for example, was once a contentious issue. Today, most African leaders accept it as an important, cost-effective investment and as part of their countries’ economic-development strategies. Basic family planning in 16 Sub-Saharan countries could save more than US$1 billion in education costs alone. The number of maternal deaths could fall by one third, saving millions (in developing countries overall, maternal and newborn healthcare savings could reach US$5.7 billion). However, the sad reality is that, despite support from various development partners and donors, assistance for reproductive healthcare and family planning fell by half in the past decade.
The compounding benefits of ending legal, economic and gender discrimination are vast. Healthier, wealthier and better-educated women tend to produce healthier, wealthier and better-educated families, because women typically invest more of their earnings than men do in their children’s wellbeing. With the continent’s population forecast to double by 2050, there is hardly a better time to invest in women and girls. It is as much an economic as an ethical argument.
Joaquim Chissano, a former president of Mozambique, co-chairs the High-Level Task Force for the International Conference on Population and Development.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe’s World
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers