While it is inevitable that incumbent officials have more advantages than their rivals when it comes to campaigning, the amount of resources the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government is throwing into its nominees’ campaigns in the Nov. 29 nine-in-one elections is still astonishing.
In Taiwan or elsewhere in the world, incumbent candidates are typically able to promote themselves through advertisements paid for by the government, and this is usually a gray area that can be tolerated by most people. However, the actions of the KMT in the Taipei mayoral race have gone far beyond the boundaries of this tacit consent.
Over the weekend, when the KMT candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) and independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) attended the Taipei Hakka Yimin Festival, organized by the Taipei City Government, Lien was able to stand or walk alongside Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), and was formally introduced by the master of ceremonies. Ko was relegated to the back of the parade, and was asked to keep his distance for “administrative neutrality” purposes — although the differing treatment of Lien and Ko was already a violation of the administrative neutrality that city officials were so eager to defend.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) last week attended a groundbreaking ceremony for the Taipei Mass Rapid Transit System’s Minsheng-Xizhi Line that was cohosted by Hau and New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫). However, it turned out that the construction of the new line has not yet been approved by the central government.
Earlier this month, Ma, accompanied by Minister of Transportation and Communications Yeh Kuang-shih (葉匡時), attended a groundbreaking ceremony for the Tamkang Bridge that is to connect New Taipei City’s Tamsui (淡水) and Bali (八里) districts. The bridge could reduce the travel time between the districts by 30 minutes as well as help to solve the traffic jams that have plagued Tamsui residents for many years.
However, the event proved to be another “fake” groundbreaking, as the New Taipei City Government has yet to obtain the land needed for the bridge.
Faced with criticism from lawmakers yesterday over the public relations stunts, Yeh said that he was aware of the realities, adding that he “would not encourage” such ceremonies.
These illusions therefore, are not simply violations of administratively neutrality, they are frauds committed by the president, the minister, the mayors and other officials. They are proof that the KMT is putting all its efforts and spending taxpayers’ money to promote its own candidates through biased acts and deception.
During Ma’s first presidential campaign, his team put out TV advertisements criticizing former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) for inaugurating new freeways section by section, so that there would be several ceremonies to remind voters of his government’s achievements. However, at least under Chen’s administration, the freeways sections were actually completed afterwards.
What we have seen from the KMT administration in recent days are Potemkin constructs, which are as far removed from the reality as most of its economic and foreign policies.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS