Because it lacks natural resources, Taiwan has to rely heavily on imported energy sources to generate electricity, meaning that more than 97 percent of the power the nation uses — primarily from oil, coal and natural gas — comes from overseas. Given this dependence, the nation needs a sustainable and consistent “green” energy policy to ensure a stable power supply, but apparently it does not have one.
Since 2005, the government has held four large-scale energy meetings, with the aim of improving energy legislation to facilitate the use of green energy sources. However, as of 2012, just 3.4 percent of Taiwan’s power was generated sustainably and fossil fuels still accounted for nearly 90 percent of all energy generated, statistics from state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) showed.
As a result, Taipower is typically under heavy financial pressure caused by the volatility of global commodity prices. Last year, it lost NT$17.06 billion (US$561.5 million) amid a surge in the cost of imported fuels, bringing its accumulated losses to NT$193.11 billion. In addition, the company has to cope with the government’s policy of purchasing power from independent energy producers.
The government is conservative about accelerating the adoption of green energy sources, even though Taiwan is the world’s No. 2 solar cell supplier, after China. This year, domestic solar companies are expected to increase their revenue by about 20 percent annually to NT$187.7 billion.
The government’s goal to have 6.2 gigawatts in installed solar power capacity nationwide by 2030 — a minuscule amount already eclipsed by the 6.8 gigawatts in installed capacity Japan has achieved so far this year — reflects this attitude. Furthermore, the government’s pricing policy does not support even that insignificant target.
The Bureau of Energy, which is in charge of the nation’s green energy subsidy policy, last month proposed cutting the feed-in-tariff mechanism for solar power suppliers by more than 16 percent to NT$5.36 per unit next year, compared with NT$6.04 at the end of last year. The rate cut will not stimulate solar power system installation and the final feed-in-tariff rates could go down further after a bidding process. Since most solar firms are capable of reducing costs by only 3 to 4 percent a year, selling solar systems would be unprofitable under the proposal.
As if this were not enough, the government’s only measures to promote green energy generation are its inadequate solar power capacity goal and its annual pricing mechanism — that is it. No supporting measures are available to facilitate the adoption of sustainable energy generation. For example, since many Taiwanese illegally construct metal roofs, the government could revise the Building Act (建築法) to encourage people to replace their sheet-metal roofs with solar panels. Another measure could be an incentive program encouraging farmers to install ground-based solar power arrays in idle fields, since about 222,000 hectares of farmland lie fallow nationwide and could potentially host a large-scale solar power system.
Public education is also insufficient. When it comes to solar power, most Taiwanese think of solar water heaters instead of solar panel systems like those increasingly adopted in nations like the US and Japan.
Last year, the government launched a project to encourage households to install rooftop solar panels to generate power for their personal use and sell any excess electricity to Taipower. However, too little publicity was generated to promote the policy and show people that they could save on electricity costs and even make some extra money by installing solar panels.
The nation not only needs a significant target for green energy generation adoption, but, more importantly, it needs a comprehensive sustainable energy policy.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers