Because it lacks natural resources, Taiwan has to rely heavily on imported energy sources to generate electricity, meaning that more than 97 percent of the power the nation uses — primarily from oil, coal and natural gas — comes from overseas. Given this dependence, the nation needs a sustainable and consistent “green” energy policy to ensure a stable power supply, but apparently it does not have one.
Since 2005, the government has held four large-scale energy meetings, with the aim of improving energy legislation to facilitate the use of green energy sources. However, as of 2012, just 3.4 percent of Taiwan’s power was generated sustainably and fossil fuels still accounted for nearly 90 percent of all energy generated, statistics from state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) showed.
As a result, Taipower is typically under heavy financial pressure caused by the volatility of global commodity prices. Last year, it lost NT$17.06 billion (US$561.5 million) amid a surge in the cost of imported fuels, bringing its accumulated losses to NT$193.11 billion. In addition, the company has to cope with the government’s policy of purchasing power from independent energy producers.
The government is conservative about accelerating the adoption of green energy sources, even though Taiwan is the world’s No. 2 solar cell supplier, after China. This year, domestic solar companies are expected to increase their revenue by about 20 percent annually to NT$187.7 billion.
The government’s goal to have 6.2 gigawatts in installed solar power capacity nationwide by 2030 — a minuscule amount already eclipsed by the 6.8 gigawatts in installed capacity Japan has achieved so far this year — reflects this attitude. Furthermore, the government’s pricing policy does not support even that insignificant target.
The Bureau of Energy, which is in charge of the nation’s green energy subsidy policy, last month proposed cutting the feed-in-tariff mechanism for solar power suppliers by more than 16 percent to NT$5.36 per unit next year, compared with NT$6.04 at the end of last year. The rate cut will not stimulate solar power system installation and the final feed-in-tariff rates could go down further after a bidding process. Since most solar firms are capable of reducing costs by only 3 to 4 percent a year, selling solar systems would be unprofitable under the proposal.
As if this were not enough, the government’s only measures to promote green energy generation are its inadequate solar power capacity goal and its annual pricing mechanism — that is it. No supporting measures are available to facilitate the adoption of sustainable energy generation. For example, since many Taiwanese illegally construct metal roofs, the government could revise the Building Act (建築法) to encourage people to replace their sheet-metal roofs with solar panels. Another measure could be an incentive program encouraging farmers to install ground-based solar power arrays in idle fields, since about 222,000 hectares of farmland lie fallow nationwide and could potentially host a large-scale solar power system.
Public education is also insufficient. When it comes to solar power, most Taiwanese think of solar water heaters instead of solar panel systems like those increasingly adopted in nations like the US and Japan.
Last year, the government launched a project to encourage households to install rooftop solar panels to generate power for their personal use and sell any excess electricity to Taipower. However, too little publicity was generated to promote the policy and show people that they could save on electricity costs and even make some extra money by installing solar panels.
The nation not only needs a significant target for green energy generation adoption, but, more importantly, it needs a comprehensive sustainable energy policy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US